Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 200 So. 2d 127.

303 citing documents.

Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 236 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
at 132 (1967) ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company, 246 La.
Dugas v. Travelers Insurance Co. 228 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Civil Code Article 1934; , .
Perniciaro v. Travelers Insurance Co. 227 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
Barlow v. City of New Orleans 228 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Grauke v. Leger 227 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The court said that so-called “similar” cases should be used only “to determine whether the award is so excessive or so inadequate as to be an abuse of discretion.” , (1967) the court recognized its duty under our Louisiana Constitution to review both the law and the facts, but stated that in view of LSA-CC Article 1934(3), the judge or jury has “much discretion” in the assessment of damages.
Fruge v. American Service Mutual Insurance 227 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
We think the award was clearly within the range of the great discretion of the trier of fact as to the quantum of damages in personal injury cases; , (1967).
Stewart v. McCarthy 228 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Although the monetary amount awarded to the daughter seems conservative, we are unable to say that either award constitutes an abuse of the great discretion of the trial court (Civil Code Article 1934; , ) to award general damages for personal injuries.
Levier v. American Employers Insurance Co. 228 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Brown v. City of Alexandria 226 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
We feel that, in so doing, , .
Goudeau v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 225 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1957); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Womax v. Earl Gibbon Transport, Inc. 226 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Collier v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 225 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Arnold v. Patterson 224 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
963 , ; , ; Thibodeaux v. Travelers Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Luquette v. Bouillion, La.App., .
Blanque v. Choppin 225 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Brignac v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 224 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
239 , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 1967, , .
Latour v. New York Fidelity & Casualty Co. 223 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Kempff v. B. E. King & Sons, Inc. 222 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
De Battista v. Southern Pacific Co. 222 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
963 , ; , ; Luquette v. Bouillion, La.App., .
Davis v. Pena 222 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1967); Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Hughes v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 221 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
963 , ; , ; Luquette v. Bouillion, La.App., .
Ballaron v. Roth 221 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
963 , ; , ; Luquette v. Bouillion, La.App., .
Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. Normand 220 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Gallioto v. Chisholm, La.App.
Harney v. Kountz 218 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Merriell v. Collins 218 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
art. 1934(3) in the lower court; , (1967).
Wyble v. Minvielle 217 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
(1967); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Kuebler v. Mixon 218 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
We find no abuse by the trial court of its great discretion (LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934; , ) to award general damages for personal injuries.
Palmisano v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 217 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Richard v. Curtis 216 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
239 , ; , , and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Trosclair v. Higgins 216 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
963 , (1964); , (1967), which have clearly defined our function in reviewing the decisions of the trial judge in these matters of quantum.
Price v. Watts 215 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934(3); , ; Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Thibodeaux v. Travelers Indemnity Company 215 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934(3); , ; Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Richard v. American Oil Company 213 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
(1967); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Hall v. State, Department of Highways 213 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Civil Code Article 1934; , (1967).
Adams v. Allstate Insurance Company 212 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
(1967), for a recent opinion by the Supreme Court in this area.
Wicker v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. 211 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In view of our codal provision, the appellate courts should consider the amount of awards in other cases only so far as they are relevant to the question of whether the judge or the jury has abused its discretion in fixing the award in the case under consideration.” Subsequently, , , the Supreme Court said: “We recognize that in cases of this type the Constitution makes it the duty of appellate courts to review both the law and the facts, but in their examination of the fact these courts must gi
Hall v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 209 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Broussard v. Allstate Insurance Co. 208 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Viator v. Gilbert 206 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Caris v. Reeves 207 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Miller v. Badalamenti 207 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Montero v. Gaconi 207 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Harris v. Travelers Insurance Co. 207 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Green v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets, Inc. 206 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Milano v. Saia 205 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In a , -132 (1967), the Supreme Court said: “We recognize that in cases of this type the Constitution makes it the duty of appellate courts to review both the law and the facts, but in their examination of the fact these courts must give effect to the basic law set out in Article 1934(3) of our Civil Code
Julian v. Ralph 206 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Article 1934 (3), Civil Code, , .
Dick v. Phillips 205 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Morgan v. Taxicab Bonding Ass'n 204 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Davis v. Lesnack 205 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
beginning on page 131 the court stated: “[3] We recognize that in cases of this type the Constitution makes it the duty of appellate courts to review both the law and the facts, but in their examination of the fact these courts must give effect to the basic law set out in Article 1934(3) of our Civil
Miller v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 204 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Allien v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 202 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
239 , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, La., (1967).