DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Melanson, 259 So. 2d 609.

17 citing documents.

  • State in the Interest of K. K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    it must be proved that the juvenile violated a specific statute or ordinance, and every element of the crime must be proved.” State v. 2 Melanson, (La.App.
  • State ex rel. K.K. 153 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    it must be proved that the juvenile violated a specific statute or ordinance, and every element of the crime must be proved.” State v. \3Melanson, (La.App.
  • State in the Interest of N.W.L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    it must be proved that the juvenile violated a specific statute or ordinance, and every element of the crime must be proved.” (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Nwl 994 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State ex rel. N.W.L. 994 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    it must be proved that the juvenile violated a specific statute or ordinance, and every element of the crime must be proved.” (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Mll 994 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State in the Intrest of M.L. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    it must be proved that the juvenile violated a specific statute or ordinance, and every element of the crime must be proved.” (La.App.
  • State ex rel. M.L.L. 994 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    it must be proved that the juvenile violated a specific statute or ordinance, and every element of the crime must be proved.” (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Dj 817 So. 2d 26 La. 2002
    [10] State in Interest of Dino, (dissenting opinion) (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 479 So. 2d 344 La. 1985
  • State v. Collum 365 So. 2d 1272 La. 1979
  • State ex rel. Joiner 365 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • State in Interest of Dino 359 So. 2d 586 La. 1978
    See, e. g., State v. Ross, La., (1977); State v. Sylvester, La., (1974); State v. Melanson, La.App., (1972).
  • State ex rel. Jones 357 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    2nd Cir. 1977); (La.App.
  • State, in Interest of Holifield 319 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Having reached this conclusion, it is unnecessary to engage in a discussion of State v. Melanson, La.App., , which held admissible a confession by a juvenile.
  • State in Interest of Simon 295 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • State in Interest of Unsworth 276 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    we have a situation similar to the present one in that one of the defendants was adjudicated a delinquent for being in possession of stolen goods, and from this adverse judgment he appealed.