Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite King v. King, 217 So. 2d 395.

68 citing documents.

United Home Care, Inc., Trinity Home Health Care, Inc. and John D. Jones v. Charlie Simpson, Charles Gardner, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
After arguing that Lee, Ortiz, and Gorman were not really apposite, he cited earlier cases holding that the right of a third party under the Direct Action Statute is fixed “at the time of the accident or injuries, and the insured’s later breach of the policy requirements for cooperation will not vitiate coverage in the absence of proof or fraud or conspiracy.” So.
Fred Tuckerson Versus Amtrust Insurance Company and Avondale Container Yard, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
(1968); Hebert v. Lafayette Consol.
Hope Dauzat v. Avoyelles Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
Dauzat ex rel. Bradford v. Avoyelles Parish School Board 86 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
Zapalowski v. Campbell 988 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
MUNAR v. State Farm Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Maria M. Munar v. State Farm Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Charan v. Bowman 965 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Comeaux v. LAFAYETTE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 944 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., supra at 1048; , (1968).
Deedra Comeaux v. Lafayette General Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., supra at 1048; (1968).
Tracy Lynne Hebert v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hebert v. LAFAYETTE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT 930 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Travis Cooper v. Louisiana Deptartment of Public Works La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Cooper v. La. Dept. of Public Works 870 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Richardson v. Aldridge 854 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
(1968); Tolbert v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Amos v. St. Martin Parish School Bd. 773 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
(1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
Parker v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 763 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Tolbert v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Shepard on Behalf of Shepard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97); , Guy v. State, Dep't of Transp.
Picou v. Equifax Services, Inc. 690 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., supra at 1048; , (1968).
Viviano v. Arceneaux 572 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
721 , , Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 233 La.
Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 562 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR. 564 So. 2d 654 La. 1990
Massey ex rel. Massey v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 557 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Fox v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MED. CTR. 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Walker, [supra]; , (1968).
Fox v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Walker, [supra]; , (1968).
Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 540 So. 2d 312 La. 1989
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., supra at 1048; , (1968).
Funez v. Jefferson Parish School Bd. 528 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
(1968); McCann v. State Farm Mut.
Johnson v. Patcraft Mills, Inc. 486 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Rather, the distinction between the ultrahazardous and the non-ultrahazardous is noted by the court in Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, supra, footnote 6 at page 636, where Justice Tate, as organ of the court, on rehearing, dealt with the issue as follows: “ , (1968); ‘Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence.
McCann v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 483 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Culver v. Ochsner Foundation Hosp. 474 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Kincade v. Doll 472 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, supra .; , (1968); Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 233 La.
Romero v. Continental Insurance Co. 467 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., and King v. King, *87 , (1968).
Lemon v. Fein 467 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Toussant v. Guice 414 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Holman v. Reliance Ins. Cos. 414 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
*1305 , (1968), cited in Footnote 6 of Boudreaux, supra, the Supreme Court declared that the applicability of this doctrine is to be determined at the conclusion of the trial.
Broussard v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins. Co. 398 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Walker v. Union Mill, Inc., , (1968).
Hebert v. Town of Ville Platte 373 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Campbell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 369 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc. 369 So. 2d 1043 La. 1979
Blackshere v. Kemper Ins. Co. 352 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
(1968); Alexander v. St.
Gregorie v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 348 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
We disagree, in light of the Supreme Court decision in that same case, , (1968).
Dillman v. Nobles 351 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1968), Nobles urges that "(r)es ipsa loquitur is irrelevant when the body of proof consists of direct evidence adequately explaining the occurrence and establishing the details of the negligence charged."
Teer v. Continental Trailways, Inc. 341 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
Hunter v. Evergreen Presbyterian Vocational School 338 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Cousins v. Henry 332 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 326 So. 2d 486 La. 1976
721 , (1972); , (1968); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
Garrison v. Hotel Dieu 319 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Gregory v. Guarisco 320 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
p. 636 " , (1968); `Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence.
Alexander v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 312 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Frazer v. Day 307 So. 2d 733 La. 1975