State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., May 31, 1973 284 So. 2d 173; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 5, 1975 313 So. 2d 380; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 31, 1973 284 So. 2d 184; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 12, 1960 123 So. 2d 419; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 18, 1910 7 Teiss. 331
State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court, 26 La. Ann. 119 (1874).
Cited by
- Green v. Frederick 136 So. 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Depetro v. Mitchner 134 So. 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- H. C. Jones & Sons v. Wascom 132 So. 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- River & Rails Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 103 So. 331 La. 1925
- Franke v. Shaw 97 So. 793 La. 1923
Opinion text
Morgan, J. Belator, on the opening of the court in November, asked the judge to sign the judgment again, which he refused to do. ^ This rule >is taken upon him to show cause why he should not be ordered to do so. He has made no answer. The judgment having been signed in vacation is, under the authority of Hernandez v. James, 25 An. 483, no judgment. Being no judgment, no appeal could be taken from it. Belator had the right to see that the judgment of which he complains should be regularly signed. The rule is made absolute.