Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 242 So. 2d 821.

183 citing documents.

Trahan v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 536 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Co., , (1970); Lejeune v. Allstate Ins.
Martyniuk v. DL-Mud, Inc. 526 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1970); Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Fowler v. Roberts 526 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative 524 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Tennis v. Hartford Ins. Co. 523 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Gresham v. Davenport 524 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
471 , Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.2d 542, 256 So.2d [620] 622 (1972).
Leman v. Allstate Insurance Co. 522 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1971): This does not mean that every consequence of a negligent act of man requires him to respond in damages.
David v. Reon 520 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra; , (1971); (La.App.
Kounter v. Carleton 510 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Peacock's, Inc. v. Shreveport Alarm Co. 510 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
discussed in Robertson, Reason Versus Rule in Louisiana Tort Law: Dialogues on Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 34 La.L.R.
Mart v. Hill 505 So. 2d 1120 La. 1987
(1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Foster v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 504 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Ledbetter v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 502 So. 2d 1383 La. 1987
State v. Skeetoe 501 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Co., , (1970); Robinson v. Allstate Ins.
Guillot v. Sandoz 497 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Williams v. Southfield School, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Co., , (1970) and Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Forest v. STATE EX REL. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 493 So. 2d 563 La. 1986
471 , (1962); , (1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Sanchez Fernandez v. General Motors Corp. 491 So. 2d 633 La. 1986
Finley v. North Assur. Co. of America 476 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
471 , (1962), have produced inconsistent language, but the facts of each case when analyzed as directed by Dixie, , (1970), and by Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Sibley v. Gifford Hill and Co., Inc. 475 So. 2d 315 La. 1985
Weber v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana 475 So. 2d 1047 La. 1985
Thomas v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 466 So. 2d 1280 La. 1985
Hill v. Lundin, supra; Jones v. Robbins, supra ; Pierre v. Allstate Insurance *1286 Co., , (1970).
Dunne v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 463 So. 2d 1267 La. 1985
Evans v. Newton 459 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
5th Cir.1983) , , (1970) in determining legal fault by first determining whether the act complained of was a substantial factor in causing the accident, then by determining what duty was imposed and whether the risk of harm suffered and created by a failure of that duty was a risk for which the statute intended to off
Mott v. Babin Motors, Inc. 451 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
(1970), on rehearing, : "All of the statutes quoted above were designed so that the flow of traffic upon our public highways would not be impeded, and that those using the highways could anticipate that free passage would be afforded their vehicles upon the paved portion of our highways.
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc. 445 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
471 , (1962); , (1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Wilson v. Chart House, Inc. 442 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1970) and Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Baach v. Clark 442 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1974) the Fourth Circuit clearly stated the above legal principle as follows: "In accordance with the method outlined in Pierre v. All-State Insurance Co. , we determine legal cause by first determining whether the act complained of was a substantial factor in causing the accident, then by determining what duty was imposed and whether the risk created by a breach of that duty was one for which the statute intended to offer protection and finally
Roshto v. Hebert 439 So. 2d 428 La. 1983
Rome v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 439 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
(1970); Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Walden v. State 430 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
on remand, , (1970); Neathery v. State, Etc., (La.App.
Palmer v. Bartley, Inc. 430 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Wright v. O'NEAL 427 So. 2d 852 La. 1983
*854 471, (1970); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Smith v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 426 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
542 , , Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Allen v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 423 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra ; , (1971); (La.
Carter v. CITY PARISH GOVERNMENT, ETC. 423 So. 2d 1080 La. 1982
Hill v. Lundin, supra, 256 So.2d at p. 622 ; Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., supra ; , (1970).
Robinson v. Allstate Insurance 424 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1970); Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Coleman v. Douglas Public Service, Inc. 423 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hoerner 426 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Co., , we determine legal cause by first determining whether the act complained of was a substantial factor in causing the accident, then by determining what duty was imposed and whether the risk created by a breach of that duty was one for which the statute intended to offer protection and finally
Guillory v. Audubon Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
542 , ] supra; , (1971); (La.App.
Sumner v. Foremost Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Lear v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co., supra; Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra; Vidrine v. Missouri Farm Association, supra.
Dye v. Kean's 412 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Straley v. Calongne Drayage and Storage, Inc., , (1970); (La.App.
Wilkinson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 411 So. 2d 22 La. 1982
Tilley v. Mount Vernon Ins. Co. 411 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Joseph v. Albarado 407 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 409 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Hill v. Lundin & *312 Associates, Inc., supra ; , (1971); (La.
Rodgers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad 405 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. Matherne 405 So. 2d 314 La. 1981
Cf. A. Yiannopoulos, Louisiana Civil Law System, 153 (1977).
Knockum v. Amoco Oil Company 402 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Nelson v. Powers 402 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
(1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.