Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 242 So. 2d 821.

183 citing documents.

Pierrotti v. Associated Indem. Corp. 399 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
471 , (1962); , (1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Neathery v. STATE, ETC. 395 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1970); Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, supra; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra; Vidrine v. Missouri Farm Association, supra.
Lear v. United States Fire Ins. Co. 392 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 390 So. 2d 497 La. 1980
(1971) and Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Brooks v. Roussel 384 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
The defense further contends that it must then be determined what duty was imposed and whether the risk created by a breach of that duty was one for which the rule of law was intended to afford protection; and it must then be decided whether defendant breached that duty
Williams v. City of Alexandria 376 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Craig v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 377 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Reinhard v. City of New Orleans 371 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Co., , (1970); Laird v. Travelers Insurance Co., 263 La.
Sullivan v. Hooker Chemical Co. 370 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Co., , (1970), footnote 2.
Guillot v. STATE, THROUGH LA STATE POLICE 364 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
DeCastro v. Boylan 367 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
the Supreme Court applied the duty risk concept of tort responsibility.
Becnel v. St. John the Baptist Parish Police Jury 364 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Jimcoily v. State Through Dept. of Highways 361 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Ainsworth v. Treadway 361 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
471 , (1962); , (1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Mitt v. Security Insurance Co. 361 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Alombro v. Campbell "66" Express, Inc. 361 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Boyer v. Johnson 360 So. 2d 1164 La. 1978
(1970); Restatement of Torts 2d, § 286, Comment d. In Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, supra , this Court stated: "Criminal statutes are not, in and of themselves, definitive of civil liability.
Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 360 So. 2d 1331 La. 1978
Co., , (1971); Stone, Tort Doctrine in Louisiana, 17 Tul.L.Rev.
STATE FARM, ETC. v. South Cent. Bell Tel. 359 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Co., , (1970), by first determining whether the conduct was a cause-in-fact of the accident, then by determining what duty was imposed and whether the risk created by a breach of that duty was one for which the statute or rule of law was intended to afford protection, and finally by determining whether defend
LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co. 356 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Co., , (1971); Hill v. Lundin & Assoc.
Allen v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. 359 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
(1970); Dixie Drive-It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Frischhertz Electric Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 357 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Kahoe v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 349 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Trahan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 348 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Higgins v. Johnson 349 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Kahoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Geisler v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 346 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
542 , (1972); , (1970); Tri-State Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Trailer Mfg.
Miller v. Carter 346 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Potts v. Hollier 344 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1970), Hollier is negligent per se.
Yates v. Brown 344 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Co., 1970, , , in each of which but for the parking of a vehicle on the highway the collision with a vehicle travelling on the highway would not have occurred.)
State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELE. CO. 343 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Co., , (1970); Dixie Drive-It-Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Deumite v. West Bank Contractors 343 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
G. VIDRINE v. Missouri Farm Association 339 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra; , (1971); (La.
Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corp. 338 So. 2d 1385 La. 1976
542 , 256 * (1972); , (1970); Tri-State Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Trailer Mfg.
Ford v. Knight 337 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 334 So. 2d 406 La. 1976
Smolinski v. Taulli, *410 Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra .; , (1971); (La.App.
Burley v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 327 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
542 , (1972), , (1970) and Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Sutton v. Langley 330 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Id, p. 136 , (1970), Rowe v. Travelers Insurance Company, 253 La.
Amco Und. of Audubon Ins. Co. v. AMERICAN RADIATOR & S. CORP. 329 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(1971): "* * * The keys for the solution of the issue of responsibility when there is more than one cause-in-fact of damages are (1) a determination of the exact risk or risks anticipated by imposition of the legal duty which has been *504 breached and (2) the legal or policy considerations which grant
Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
(1970); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Prattini v. Whorton 326 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Haas v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company 321 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Co., , (1970), we first determine whether that act was a cause-in-fact of the accident.
Ayala v. Bailey Electric Company, Inc. 318 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Co., , (1970), we first inquire into causation in fact, which is a "but for" question.
Leftwich v. Molony 322 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Shepeard v. Baggett Transportation Co. 322 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1970) the Supreme Court discussed the Louisiana driver’s license law and the highway regulatory act from the standpoint of civil responsibility.
Lee v. Vidrine 316 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Raphile v. Alexander 315 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Linnear v. Wilson 312 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Tri-State Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Trailer Mfg. Co. 312 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
542 , (1972); , (1970); Robertson, Reason Versus Rule in Louisiana Tort Law, 34 La.Law Rev. 1 (1973).
Gore v. Miller 311 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
199 , (1972); , (1971); Robertson, Dialogues on Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 34 La.L.Rev.