Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 249 So. 2d 133.

224 citing documents.

Elnaggar v. Fred H. Moran Const. Corp. 468 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1067 , (1971), cited by plaintiffs-appellants herein.
Beck v. Boh Bros. Const. Co. 467 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
In determining the final issue of whether the plaintiff assumed the risk, (La.App.
Bell v. Jet Wheel Blast, Div. of Ervin Industries 462 So. 2d 166 La. 1985
Co., supra ; , (1971); See 2 Colin et Capitant, Cours elementaire de droit civil francois (8c Ed.1935) § 190.
Lewis v. Oubre 461 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 458 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
See Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 258 La.1067, (1971).
MAYOR & COUNCIL ETC. v. Jesse J. Fontenot 460 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(1971); Briley v. Mitchell, 238 La.
Prejean v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 457 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of La., Inc. 456 So. 2d 612 La. 1984
See Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., supra ; , (1971).
Northern v. Department of Streets of New Orleans 455 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Bizette v. State Farm Insurance Co. 454 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Shook v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 451 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coburn v. Commercial Nat. Bank 453 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Dunshee v. Comfort 441 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1005, , (1971): “The determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry, whereas contributory negligence is determined objectively under the reasonable man standard.
Garsee v. WESTERN CAS. & SUR. CO., INC. 437 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Maltzahn v. City of New Orleans 433 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Broussard v. Continental Oil Co. 433 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Langlois v. Allied *357 Chemical Corporation, , (1971).
Miller v. Broussard 430 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
The plaintiffs allege that contributory negligence is not available in a
Brown v. White 430 So. 2d 16 La. 1983
While, as argued by plaintiff, , seems to support the argument that contributory negligence is not a defense to a strict liability cause of action
Entrevia v. Hood 427 So. 2d 1146 La. 1983
Buchanan v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury 426 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1971), an absolute liability or no fault case, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the doctrine of assumption of risk [3] was available as a defense but that contributory negligence was not.
Johnson v. Alexander 424 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In Prestenback v. Sentry Insurance Company, 340 So2d 1331 (La.1976), the Supreme Court discussed the knowledge element of the defense: “ , (1971), “the determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry ....
Falgout v. Wardlaw 423 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
(1971); Dorry, supra; Carpenter v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
Williams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 421 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
I find that the plaintiff's own fault would preclude him from recovering in this case even under a [ , (La.
Schaeffer v. Duvall 421 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Crowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 416 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
As to the affirmative defense of assumption of the risk, stated, on page 438, that: " , (1971): The determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry, whereas contributory negligence is determined objectively under the reasonable man standard.
Sumner v. Foremost Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Mcdaniel v. Allstate Insurance 416 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1971), the court states: The determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry, whereas contributory negligence is determined objectively under the reasonable man standard.
Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 418 So. 2d 493 La. 1982
James v. Vance 411 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McInnis v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., Langlois [ , ], supra.
Flair v. Bd. of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Bd. 411 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
[7] , , indicates contributory negligence is not a defense to strict liability.
Carpenter v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 411 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
(1971); Restatement (Second), Torts, Sect.
Seals v. Morris 410 So. 2d 715 La. 1982
Lawrence v. Grant Parish School Bd. 409 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Champion v. Panel Era Mfg. Co. 410 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
LaBorde v. Eagle Trucking Co. 409 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lytell v. Hushfield 408 So. 2d 1344 La. 1982
(1971): The determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry, whereas contributory negligence is determined objectively under the reasonable man standard.
Wetzka v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 409 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
See, e. g., Hero Lands v. Texaco, supra ; Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board, , (1971); Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 227 La.
Stewart v. Sam Wallace Indus. Co. 409 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
at 140 (1971), stated categorically that contributory negligence could not be urged as a defense to a strict liability action, inasmuch as contributory negligence presupposed negligence on the part of the tortfeasor and such negligence was not an ingredient of the defendant's fault under strict liabili
Joseph v. Albarado 407 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Hastings v. Dis Tran Products, Inc., 389 F.2d 1352 (W.D.La.1975); and Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, [ , ], above."
Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 409 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Langlois [v. Allied Chemical Corporation, , (1971)], supra."
Androwski v. Ole McDonald's Farms, Inc. 407 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Robillard v. P & R RACETRACKS, INC. 405 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
This instruction tracks the language of 2 Louisiana Jury Instructions, Civil, 67 (1980), , (1971).
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co. 403 So. 2d 26 La. 1981
Jackson v. Tri-State Elevator Co., Inc. 401 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
The plurality retreated from a , (1971) that in no case of strict liability would ordinary contributory negligence be a defense.
Frey v. Galle 399 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Navratil v. Smart 400 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
*272 Finally, he also cites Civil Code Article 667 , (1971) for the proposition that a landowner is liable to third parties for injuries suffered by them due to noxious substances.
Smith v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 399 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1971); and Loescher v. Parr, supra.
Dorry v. LaFleur 399 So. 2d 559 La. 1981
(1971), we suggested that in no case of strict liability would ordinary contributory negligence be a defense.
Philippe v. Browning Arms Co. 395 So. 2d 310 La. 1981
Jones v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ETC. 388 So. 2d 737 La. 1980
we observed that negligence is only one form of the "fault" for which C.C.