Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Patterson, 250 So. 2d 721.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Desmond Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Gurvis Harvey, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Brown 36 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
14:27(D)(3) found that the defendant's sentence was not excessive and stated: As to the argument relating to the sentence for attempted forcible rape we have ruled in State v. Patterson, [ ,] and in State v. Glantz, [ 254 La.
State v. Moore 696 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-856 (La.1983), in deciding that a sentence of imprisonment for attempted armed robbery must be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, the supreme court reaffirmed its holding in an earlier case, , (1971), wherein it held that the phrase "in the same manner" in the attempt statute, La.
State v. Griffin 470 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Henry 470 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Crayton 470 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
In the case of “attempted armed robbery” the phrase “in the same manner” means that except for the term of imprisonment, which is specifically provided for, the other aspects of the fine or imprisonment shall be “in the same manner” as provided for armed robbery; that is, “at hard labor” and “without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence.” , (1971).
State v. Robertson 459 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
(1971), holding that the phrase `in the same manner' means `at hard labor' and `without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence' as provided for armed robbery.
State v. Dixon 442 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Maggio 432 So. 2d 854 La. 1983
(1971), holding that the phrase "in the same *856 manner" means "at hard labor" and "without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence" as provided for armed robbery.
State v. Middlebrook 409 So. 2d 588 La. 1982
that the phrase "in the same manner" in the attempted crimes statute *593 means exactly what it says, i.e., that the other aspects of the imprisonment shall be "in the same manner" as provided for in the crime statute itself.
Keys v. Sambo's Restaurant, Inc. 389 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State v. Muller 365 So. 2d 464 La. 1978
State v. Butler 331 So. 2d 425 La. 1976
[3] This conclusion is buttressed by the doctrine of strict construction of penal statutes under which close questions as to coverage of criminal provisions are resolved in favor of the accused, , (1921), State v. Penniman, 224 La.
Sevin v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n 283 So. 2d 690 La. 1973