Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gladden, 257 So. 2d 388.

60 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
773, 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966); So.2d 388 (1972).
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966); , (1972).
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith 982 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Breaux 920 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Quinones 864 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Carcamo 860 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Jenkins 846 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Jordan 802 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Jenkins v. Baldwin 801 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
appeal dismissed, certiorari denied sub nom.
State v. Watts 738 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
(1972); appeal dismissed, cert.
State v. Bradshaw 571 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1972), rehearing denied, 1972, appeal dismissed, cert.
State v. Beauchamp 510 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. James 444 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1972), rehearing denied 1972; appeal dismissed, cert.
State v. Jones 443 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Walgamotte 415 So. 2d 205 La. 1982
773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966); , (1972).
State v. Vinet 352 So. 2d 684 La. 1977
State v. Kinchen 342 So. 2d 174 La. 1977
State v. Batiste, La., (1975); , (1972).
State v. Owens 338 So. 2d 645 La. 1976
(1972); State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Alfred 337 So. 2d 1049 La. 1976
988 , 18 L. Ed.2d 1 (1967); , (1972).
State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1058 La. 1976
State v. Howard 325 So. 2d 812 La. 1976
State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
[2] These decisions include: , (1972) (syllabus 9); State v. Mitchell, 258 La.
State v. Lemoine 319 So. 2d 911 La. 1975
232 , .” , (1972); State v. McQueen, 257 La.
State v. Bernard 320 So. 2d 159 La. 1975
471 , (1971); , (1972); State v. McQueen, 257 La.
State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
15:493; State v. Lane, La., (1974); , (1972).
State v. Kuykendall 319 So. 2d 326 La. 1975
344 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Nails, 255 La.
State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
In regard to the evidence necessary to establish a chain of custody, , (1972) that: The chain of custody or connexity of the evidence is a matter for the jury to decide, so long as the objects introduced are shown to be reasonably connected with the defendant or the crime and have some relevancy which the trial judge considers sufficient to warrant their introduction into
State v. Stetson 317 So. 2d 172 La. 1975
455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971); , (1972); La.Code Crim.Proc.
State v. Singleton 311 So. 2d 881 La. 1975
State v. Perkins 310 So. 2d 591 La. 1975
(Summers, J., dissenting); , (1972).
State v. Sibley 310 So. 2d 100 La. 1975
(1972); State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Hayes 306 So. 2d 705 La. 1975
43 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Freeman 306 So. 2d 703 La. 1975
(1972) that: The chain of custody or connexity of the evidence is a matter for the jury to decide, so long as the objects introduced are shown to be reasonably connected with the defendant or the crime and have some relevancy which the trial judge considers sufficient to warrant their introduction into
State v. Black 305 So. 2d 472 La. 1974
(1972), appeal dismissed, 410 U. S. 920 , 93 S.Ct.
State v. Flood 301 So. 2d 637 La. 1974
(1972) that: "The chain of custody or connexity of the evidence is a matter for the jury to decide, so long as the objects introduced are shown to be reasonably connected with the defendant or the crime and have some relevancy which the trial judge considers sufficient to warrant their introduction int
State v. Lane 302 So. 2d 880 La. 1974
(1972) that the Jencks Act is not applicable to a State court trial.
State v. Bradford 298 So. 2d 781 La. 1974
State v. Sears 298 So. 2d 814 La. 1974
43 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
(1972), wherein we stated: "Aside from the obvious fact that there has been no showing that any portion of the reports contained any evidence favorable to the defendant, we do not find the Brady Case applicable here.
State v. Brooks 294 So. 2d 503 La. 1974
State v. Thomas 290 So. 2d 317 La. 1974
State v. Gray 286 So. 2d 644 La. 1973
State v. Baker 288 So. 2d 52 La. 1973
(1972), the accused must not be permitted by the trial court to engage in a broad or blind fishing expedition among documents possessed by the prosecution on the chance that something favorable might turn up.
State v. Franks 284 So. 2d 584 La. 1973
43 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Tharp 284 So. 2d 536 La. 1973