Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 620.

403 citing documents.

  • Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center 869 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Lazard v. Foti 859 So. 2d 656 La. 2003
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
  • Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 855 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/9/98) ; , writ denied, 99-86 (La.3/1/99); (quoting Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972)).
  • Hall v. Folger Coffee Co. 857 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See Fontenot, 635 So.2d at 223 (citing Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972)).
  • Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    The Supreme Court adopted the duty-risk analysis in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Toston v. Pardon 847 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Louviere v. Louviere 839 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Haydin v. Crescent Guardian, Inc. 818 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hill [v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972)1 supra.
  • Matta v. Snow 807 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Davis, 762 So.2d at 233 ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Fontenot v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 787 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    App. 1 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds, , 260 La.
  • Bridges v. FCS Entertainment 789 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
  • Louisiana Swabbing Ser. v. Enterprise Prod. Company 784 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
  • King v. Danna 784 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Bonds v. ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSP. 782 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
  • Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
    1991); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • LeBlanc v. Breaux 777 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5th Cir.11/26/96), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Guilliams v. Succession of Harrel 774 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways, Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
  • Nunez v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 774 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the supreme court endorsed an ease of association test which asks how easily the risk of harm can be associated with the rule which was breached.
  • Fleming v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 774 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    1987); Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
  • Davis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 762 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5th Cir. 11/26/96), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates
  • Holloway v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    2nd Cir. 8/19/98), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); (La.
  • Paul v. LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES'GROUP 762 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
  • Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Hill v. Lundin & 137Associates
  • LeBlanc v. Stevenson 756 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the supreme court endorsed an ease of association test which asks how easily the risk of harm can be associated with the rule which was breached.
  • Lichti v. Schumpert Medical Center 750 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Robertson v. State 747 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972); Roberts, supra ; Weaver, supra .
  • Smith v. Shoney's, Inc. 745 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Shoney’s argues such a result does not satisfy the “ease of association” test as set forth in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , wherein the supreme court found that a contractor who had left a ladder standing upright against a house was under no duty to protect a maid from the risk of tripping over the ladder after a third party had placed the ladder on the ground.
  • Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Ins.
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Ease of Association As recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), foreseeability should not in all instances be the only criterion used for determining whether there is a duty-risk relationship.
  • Guerra v. White 755 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    471 , (1962), and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Scott v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 732 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 3/5/97); , writ not considered, 97-0895 (La.5/9/97); , quoting Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , -623 (1972).
  • Trahan v. McManus 728 So. 2d 1273 La. 1999
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
  • EP v. City of Lafayette 722 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , -23 (La.1972) (citations and footnotes omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court provides direction for determining whether a particular risk falls within the scope of protection afforded by a particular duty: Foreseeability is not always a reliable guide, and certainly it is not the only criterion for
  • Manning v. Benton 721 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    “[I]f the defendant’s conduct of which the plaintiff complains is a cause in fact of the harm, we are then required in a determination of negligence to ascertain whether the defendant breached a legal duty imposed to protect against the particular risk involved.” Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , (1972).
  • Goodrich v. Caterpillar, Inc. 717 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Roberts v. Benoit, supra .
  • Ludwig v. Jefferson Performing Arts Society 714 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    5 Cir. 11/26/96) ; ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Muse v. Dunbar 716 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , (1972).
  • Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 716 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , (1972).
  • Crockett v. Cardona 713 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc. 707 So. 2d 1225 La. 1998
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
  • Milazzo v. Olsten Home Health Care, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    5 Cir. 11/26/96) ; ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Blanchard v. STATE, THROUGH PARKS & REC. COM'N 702 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
  • Blanchard v. State ex rel. Parks & Recreation Commission 702 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mieh.L.Rev.
  • Boteler v. Rivera 700 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    471 , (1962) and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Todd v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES 699 So. 2d 35 La. 1997
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Owens v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 699 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Co., Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972); THOMAS C. GALLIGAN, JR., " Hill v. Lundin & Associates" Revisited: Duty Risked to Death?
  • Williams v. Dean 694 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d at 1122 ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , -23 (1972).