Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 620.
-
Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center
869 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Lazard v. Foti
859 So. 2d 656
La. 2003
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
-
Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc.
855 So. 2d 781
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 12/9/98) ; , writ denied, 99-86 (La.3/1/99); (quoting Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972)).
-
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.
857 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See Fontenot, 635 So.2d at 223 (citing Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972)).
-
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp.
853 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
The Supreme Court adopted the duty-risk analysis in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Toston v. Pardon
847 So. 2d 119
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Louviere v. Louviere
839 So. 2d 57
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Haydin v. Crescent Guardian, Inc.
818 So. 2d 1033
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Hill [v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972)1 supra.
-
Matta v. Snow
807 So. 2d 934
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Davis, 762 So.2d at 233 ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Fontenot v. Southwestern Offshore Corp.
787 So. 2d 588
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
App. 1 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds, , 260 La.
-
Bridges v. FCS Entertainment
789 So. 2d 691
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
Louisiana Swabbing Ser. v. Enterprise Prod. Company
784 So. 2d 862
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
King v. Danna
784 So. 2d 757
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Bonds v. ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSP.
782 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR
786 So. 2d 682
La. 2001
1991); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Short v. Plantation Management Corp.
781 So. 2d 46
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
LeBlanc v. Breaux
777 So. 2d 532
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5th Cir.11/26/96), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Guilliams v. Succession of Harrel
774 So. 2d 325
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways, Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
-
Nunez v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.
774 So. 2d 208
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the supreme court endorsed an ease of association test which asks how easily the risk of harm can be associated with the rule which was breached.
-
Fleming v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
774 So. 2d 174
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
1987); Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
Davis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
762 So. 2d 229
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 11/26/96), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT
758 So. 2d 923
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Hill v. Lundin & Associates
-
Holloway v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.
759 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2nd Cir. 8/19/98), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); (La.
-
Paul v. LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES'GROUP
762 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
Perkins v. Entergy Corp.
756 So. 2d 388
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development
758 So. 2d 923
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Hill v. Lundin & 137Associates
-
LeBlanc v. Stevenson
756 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the supreme court endorsed an ease of association test which asks how easily the risk of harm can be associated with the rule which was breached.
-
Lichti v. Schumpert Medical Center
750 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Robertson v. State
747 So. 2d 1276
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972); Roberts, supra ; Weaver, supra .
-
Smith v. Shoney's, Inc.
745 So. 2d 223
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Shoney’s argues such a result does not satisfy the “ease of association” test as set forth in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , wherein the supreme court found that a contractor who had left a ladder standing upright against a house was under no duty to protect a maid from the risk of tripping over the ladder after a third party had placed the ladder on the ground.
-
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co.
745 So. 2d 1
La. 1999
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Ins.
-
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
738 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Ease of Association As recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), foreseeability should not in all instances be the only criterion used for determining whether there is a duty-risk relationship.
-
Guerra v. White
755 So. 2d 894
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
471 , (1962), and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
-
Scott v. Rapides Parish School Bd.
732 So. 2d 749
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 3/5/97); , writ not considered, 97-0895 (La.5/9/97); , quoting Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , -623 (1972).
-
Trahan v. McManus
728 So. 2d 1273
La. 1999
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
-
EP v. City of Lafayette
722 So. 2d 1182
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , -23 (La.1972) (citations and footnotes omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court provides direction for determining whether a particular risk falls within the scope of protection afforded by a particular duty: Foreseeability is not always a reliable guide, and certainly it is not the only criterion for
-
Manning v. Benton
721 So. 2d 526
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
“[I]f the defendant’s conduct of which the plaintiff complains is a cause in fact of the harm, we are then required in a determination of negligence to ascertain whether the defendant breached a legal duty imposed to protect against the particular risk involved.” Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , (1972).
-
Goodrich v. Caterpillar, Inc.
717 So. 2d 1235
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Roberts v. Benoit, supra .
-
Ludwig v. Jefferson Performing Arts Society
714 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/26/96) ; ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Muse v. Dunbar
716 So. 2d 110
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , (1972).
-
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co.
716 So. 2d 387
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , (1972).
-
Crockett v. Cardona
713 So. 2d 802
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
-
Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc.
707 So. 2d 1225
La. 1998
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
-
Milazzo v. Olsten Home Health Care, Inc.
708 So. 2d 1108
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/26/96) ; ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Blanchard v. STATE, THROUGH PARKS & REC. COM'N
702 So. 2d 768
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
Blanchard v. State ex rel. Parks & Recreation Commission
702 So. 2d 768
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mieh.L.Rev.
-
Boteler v. Rivera
700 So. 2d 913
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
471 , (1962) and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
-
Todd v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES
699 So. 2d 35
La. 1997
See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Owens v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc.
699 So. 2d 434
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Co., Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972); THOMAS C. GALLIGAN, JR., " Hill v. Lundin & Associates" Revisited: Duty Risked to Death?
-
Williams v. Dean
694 So. 2d 1195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d at 1122 ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , -23 (1972).