DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 620.

403 citing documents.

  • Tassin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    As stated in Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972), rules of negligence are not designed to protect every victim against every risk that may befall him simply because a violation of a rule may have played some part in producing the injury.
  • Todd v. State 685 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Trahan v. McManus 689 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    denied, 94-2474, 94-2475 (La.12/19/94); (citing Hill v. Lundin and Assoc., Inc., , (1972)).
  • Stroik v. Ponseti 683 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Faucheaux, supra, 615 So.2d at 292 .
  • Daigrepont v. State 688 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
  • Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    See Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d at 1122 ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , -23 (1972).
  • Todd v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services 685 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Winn v. City of Alexandria 685 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Teel v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 681 So. 2d 340 La. 1996
    Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 p. 4 (La.11/30/94), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Misenheimer v. WBR PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE 677 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 673 So. 2d 585 La. 1996
    [7] See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
  • Begnaud v. Department of Transp. & Dev. 679 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Carlton v. Foti 660 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    See generally, e.g., Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 657 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972)
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Roberts, supra; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Elder v. Rowe 653 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in the leading case of Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc., , noted that “conduct which creates an appreciable range of risk for causing harm ...
  • Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    (La.1990), citing PPG Industries, Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Jackson v. Ferrand 658 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Roberts, 605 So.2d at 1055 , quoting Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Peterson v. Doe 647 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Roberts, 605 So.2d at 1055 , quoting Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 646 So. 2d 318 La. 1994
    1987); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • David v. Guidry 645 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    See: Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Olivier v. Boudreaux 649 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Hill v. Lundin [&] Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
  • Kramer v. Continental Cas. Co. 641 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Cf. Hill v. Lundin, supra [ , (1972)].
  • Bordelon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 640 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., (1972).
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 635 So. 2d 219 La. 1994
    1987); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    See, Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
  • Bozeman v. Reed 633 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Cay v. STATE, DOTD 631 So. 2d 393 La. 1994
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Guilfore v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 631 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
  • Broussard v. CNA Insurance Co. 628 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    As a negligence action, and considering the undisputed facts and circumstances of the case, the plaintiffs’ action is governed by the familiar seminal case of Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972) and the cases which have followed and refined the doctrine of that case.
  • Rosenblath's, Inc. v. Evans 628 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    » Once it is determined that “the defendant’s conduct of which the plaintiff complains is a cause in fact of the harm, we are then required in a determination of negligence to ascertain whether the defendant breached a legal duty imposed to protect against the particular risk involved.” , (1972).
  • Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. 627 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Geter v. Maten 626 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Duty-Risk Analysis In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the landmark decision involving unattended ladders, our supreme court applied the duty-risk analysis and rejected the proposition that simply leaving a ladder unattended is negligence per se, specifying that the duty-risk analysis is to be applied in light of the particular facts of the controv
  • Miller v. Bailey 621 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.542, (La.
  • Thibodeau v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City 619 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Burdis v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury 618 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.
  • Scott v. State 618 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    See also Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Laiche v. Kohen 621 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    NOTES [1] Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.
  • Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    See Hebert, supra, at 114 , discussing Simon and Kent, supra, citing Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., (La.
  • Katsanis v. State Farm General Ins. Co. 615 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    Hill v. *1119 Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
  • Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
  • Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Government 615 So. 2d 289 La. 1993
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Joseph v. Cannon 609 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, *1042 Inc., , (1972); See also McNamara, The Duties and Risks of the Duty-Risk Analysis, 44 La.L.Rev.
  • Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Gov. 597 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), Prosser, Law of Torts, Sec.
  • Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).