DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 620.

403 citing documents.

  • Cypress Oilfield Contr. v. McGoldrick Oil 525 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    1987); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Crowe, The Anatomy of a Tort, 22 Loy.
  • Meshell v. Shamsie 528 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Crowe, The Anatomy of a Tort, 22 Loy.L.Rev.
  • Morris v. Canipe 528 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.
  • LeBleu v. Dynamic Indus. Constructors, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Tennis v. Hartford Ins. Co. 523 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), citing Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Brady v. State ex rel. Louisiana Health & Human Resources Administration 525 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Code art. 2315 (1870) (as amended); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System, Inc. v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
  • Francioni v. Rault 518 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Annis v. Shapiro 517 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 517 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Riche v. City of Baton Rouge 515 So. 2d 765 La. 1987
    Citing Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the trial court said, "a duty upon one to keep barricades put together does not encompass the risk of a child on a bicycle running into a board after the board had been washed away from its original location by rainwater."
  • Perro v. State 517 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.
  • David v. Reon 520 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
  • Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Johnson v. Hartford Acc.
  • Peacock's, Inc. v. Shreveport Alarm Co. 510 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    citing Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Burge v. City of Hammond 509 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    See also, Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • MJ Womack, Inc. v. State House of Rep. 509 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Mart v. Hill 505 So. 2d 1120 La. 1987
    471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Kyle v. City of Bogalusa 506 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Sanchez v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources, C.A. 506 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    In determining whether the risk of harm of being murdered by Ingram falls within the protection of a legal duty owed the deceased by defendants, we are guided by the following language appearing in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972): The same policy considerations which would motivate a legislative body to impose duties to protect from certain risks are applied by the court in making its determination.
  • Sanchez v. STATE, DEPT. OF H. & HR 506 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    In determining whether the risk of harm of being murdered by Ingram falls within the protection of a legal duty owed the deceased by defendants, we are guided by the following language appearing in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972): The same policy considerations which would motivate a legislative body to impose duties to protect from certain risks are applied by the court in making its determination.
  • Chatelain v. PROJECT SQUARE 505 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Distinguished Melerine v. State 505 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Snyder v. Bergeron 501 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Frazee v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 498 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Kent, supra, at page 500; Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Thibodaux v. Acme Truck Line, Inc. 496 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Phillips v. Roy 494 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. Am.
  • Williams v. Southfield School, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Forest v. STATE EX REL. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 493 So. 2d 563 La. 1986
    471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Rowe v. Travelers Insurance Co., 253 La.
  • Gadman v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Entrevia, supra, , (1972).
  • McGillivray v. Rapides Iberia Management Ent. 493 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Gadman v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Entrevia, supra, , (1972).
  • Bouton v. Allstate Ins. Co. 491 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Blanchard v. Riley Stoker Corp. 492 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); (La.App.
  • Shafouk Nor El Din Hamza v. Bourgeois 493 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Burge v. City of Hammond 489 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    See also, Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Pickett v. Jacob Schoen & Son, Inc. 488 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    (1972), for the well recognized principles of the duty-risk analysis in our tort law.
  • Mitchell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 488 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Carter v. City Parish Government, Etc., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Myers v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 483 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Tillotson v. Undisclosed Insurance Co. 486 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin & Associated, Inc.
  • Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., 260 La.542, (1972) ; Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
  • Walpole v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. 482 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    363 (1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), discussed by Professor Robertson in Reason Versus Rule in Louisiana Tort Law: Dialogues on Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 34 La.L.Rev.
  • Armand v. La. Power & Light Co. 482 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Snider v. Pagragan 480 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    As stated in Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972), rules of negligence are not designed to protect every victim against every risk that may befall him simply because a violation of a rule may have played some part in producing the injury.
  • LeBlanc v. Acadian Credit Plan, Inc. 478 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
  • Beauclair v. Travelers Insurance Co. 480 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    We examine the record and the jury’s determination in light of the analysis employed in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), and first consider whether any causal relationship existed between the harm to plaintiff and Caubarreaux’s allegedly negligent conduct.
  • Libertine v. Aetna Ins. Co. 477 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Johnson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 476 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    The duty-risk analysis in determining whether a particular defendant is guilty of negligence is well entrenched in our law as a result of Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), and its progeny.
  • Finley v. North Assur. Co. of America 476 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    471 , (1970), and by Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), support the individual result in each case, notwithstanding inconsistency in the "rules" some-times loosely applied.
  • Sibley v. Gifford Hill and Co., Inc. 475 So. 2d 315 La. 1985
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Weber v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana 475 So. 2d 1047 La. 1985
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).