Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 620.
-
Lanclos v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.
470 So. 2d 924
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972) ; Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
State v. Joint Comm'n on Accreditation of Hosps., Inc.
470 So. 2d 169
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
471 , (1962); Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972), and their progeny, that the defendant has breached a duty which encompassed the risk which caused the injury to Conway's patients.
-
Golden v. Madden Contracting Co., Inc.
469 So. 2d 1039
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Casual Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
Verret on Behalf of Gatlin v. Scott
470 So. 2d 228
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Duty is created either by statute or jurisprudence, , (1972).
-
WHC, INC. v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc.
468 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
*767 542, (1972); Sanborn, 448 So.2d at 94 ; (La.App.
-
Thomas v. Missouri Pacific RR Co.
466 So. 2d 1280
La. 1985
471 , (1962); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); (La.
-
Reyes v. State
466 So. 2d 538
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972) [quoting Malone, Ruminations on Cause-In-Fact, 9 Stanford L.Rev.
-
Broussard v. Yellow Freight Lines, Inc.
464 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Naylor v. La.
-
Dunne v. Orleans Parish School Bd.
463 So. 2d 1267
La. 1985
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
McCart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
460 So. 2d 1104
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, the Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
American Wholesale Jewelers, Inc. v. American Druggist Insurance Co.
457 So. 2d 244
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
La.Civil Code art. 2315; Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., *247 242 La.
-
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
454 So. 2d 1081
La. 1984
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972); PPG Industries
- Nicholson v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 449 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
Guerra v. Karam
449 So. 2d 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
- Nicholson v. LA. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOP. 449 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
Dealey v. State
448 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
Dunne v. Orleans Parish School Bd.
444 So. 2d 1317
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
and its progeny, Louisiana employs the duty risk analysis in determining whether a particular defendant is guilty of negligence.
-
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
445 So. 2d 756
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Brewington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections
447 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean Dredging
447 So. 2d 1058
La. 1984
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
Campbell v. Continental-Emsco Co.
445 So. 2d 70
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
See Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc.
-
Mitchell v. South Central Bell
442 So. 2d 876
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the following duty-risk analysis was set forth: (1) Was the conduct complained of a cause in fact of the harm?
-
Landry v. Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc.
443 So. 2d 1139
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
(1972) and its progeny, Louisiana employs a "duty risk" analysis in determining whether a particular defendant is guilty of negligence.
-
Wilson v. Chart House, Inc.
442 So. 2d 1263
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Dupree v. Louisiana Transit Management, Inc.
441 So. 2d 436
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., Inc., , (1972).
-
Tripkovich v. Gilbert Engineering Corp.
439 So. 2d 1172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
whether the defendants] breached a legal duty imposed to protect against the particular risk involved.” Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
-
Guillot v. Fisherman's Paradise, Inc.
437 So. 2d 840
La. 1983
See also Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Blackwell v. Oser
436 So. 2d 1293
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
as in Palsgraf , the decisive factor in relieving the defendant of liability was the lack of relation between the defendant's duty and the plaintiff's risk, that is, the particular harm was not foreseeable to the defendant: "The risk encountered by the plaintiff which caused her harm was the
-
Jacoby v. State
434 So. 2d 570
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive-It-Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
-
Bridgewater v. State Through Dept. of Corr.
434 So. 2d 383
La. 1983
See Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc.
-
Williams v. City of New Orleans
433 So. 2d 1129
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself Systems v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
-
Maltzahn v. City of New Orleans
433 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
Broussard v. Continental Oil Co.
433 So. 2d 354
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
Brock v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
433 So. 2d 1083
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
See generally Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , , (La.1972) and Crowe, "The Anatomy of a TortGreenian, as interpreted by Crowe who has been influenced by Malone-A Primer", 22 Loy.L.R.
-
Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co.
430 So. 2d 55
La. 1983
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Kemp v. Hudnall
428 So. 2d 474
La. 1983
Hill v. Lundin & Assoc.
-
Palmer v. Bartley, Inc.
430 So. 2d 118
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
NOTES [1] See Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , Head v. St.
-
Wright v. O'NEAL
427 So. 2d 852
La. 1983
1982); Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Entrevia v. Hood
427 So. 2d 1146
La. 1983
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Green, The Causal Relation Issue, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
-
Ronstadt v. Begnaud Motors, Inc.
427 So. 2d 911
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Co., supra, and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.
-
Hoffpauir v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
427 So. 2d 560
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
1976); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (La.
-
McKinnie v. Dept. of Transp. & Development
426 So. 2d 344
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
See Hill v. Lundin & Assoc., , (1972).
-
Hebert v. Gulf States Utilities Co.
426 So. 2d 111
La. 1983
Hall v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Smith v. Fusilier
424 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); (La.App.
-
Gums v. Delta Downs, Inc.
425 So. 2d 303
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Head v. St.
-
Chapman v. Gulf Ins. Co.
425 So. 2d 277
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
App. 3 Cir.1982), writ denied, writ denied, Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Martin v. COTTON'S PEST AID CONTROL, ETC.
424 So. 2d 1216
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
-
Smith v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
426 So. 2d 697
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
-
Allen v. Housing Authority of New Orleans
423 So. 2d 1291
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself Systems v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
-
Carter v. CITY PARISH GOVERNMENT, ETC.
423 So. 2d 1080
La. 1982
Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.