Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co., 262 So. 2d 385.
-
King v. Danna
784 So. 2d 757
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Jackson v. Scott Truck and Tractor, Inc., supra; Traweek v. Jackson, 30,248 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), ; Jackson v. Town of Grambling, 29,198 and 29,199 (La.App.2d Cir.2/26/97), .
-
Moreno v. Simonton
779 So. 2d 887
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
(1972), defines an independent contractor as one who has contracted for: ...
-
Cliburn v. Police Jury Ass'n of Louisiana
770 So. 2d 899
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In making the determination that Cliburn was an employee of the Police Jury, , (1972), mandated a finding of employee status.
-
Campbell v. HOSPITAL SERV. DIST. NO. 1, CALDWELL PARISH
768 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
(1972); Roberts v. State, Through La.
-
Buckley v. Vess Beverage, Inc.
759 So. 2d 133
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The factors that must be met to establish a , (1972), (La.App.
- MacK v. CDI CONTRACTORS INC. 757 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-
Bellard v. Castille
759 So. 2d 789
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
(1972) that: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfilled in accordance
- Crews v. Blalock 746 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- City of Shreveport v. KINGWOOD FOREST 746 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
Wiley v. Safeway Ins. Co.
745 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., , (1972), citing the following passage: [O]ne who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what sub
- Prater v. Porter 737 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
-
Ledent v. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co.
723 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
(1972); Smith, supra; Morales, supra; Perkins v. Gregory Mfg.
- Kaufman v. City of New Orleans 720 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- Netecke v. State ex rel. DOTD 715 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Remet v. Martin 705 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
Cooper v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
699 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
(1972), as follows: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequently and upon reflec
-
Barron v. Webb
698 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
(1972), the supreme court defined an independent contractor as one who has contracted for: ...
-
Cooley v. Benson Motor Co. of New Orleans
695 So. 2d 1049
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Transport Co., , -391 (La.1972).
- Jackson v. Town of Grambling 690 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
-
Teel v. Superior Scrap Metals
675 So. 2d 1169
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
at 390-391 as follows: [one who has contracted for] a specific piecework as a unit to be done according to the independent contractor's own methods, without being subject to the control and direction, in the performance of the service, of his employer ...
-
Bob v. Benoit
673 So. 2d 1321
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
*1323 |4The court, , described the independent-contractor relationship, as follows: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the co
-
Doucet v. Doug Ashy Bldg. Materials, Inc.
671 So. 2d 1148
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
(1972); Swan v. Vernon Mill.
- Perkins v. Gregory Mfg. Co. 671 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Olivier v. Best Workover, Inc.
669 So. 2d 476
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir.1983), writ denied, , (1972).
-
Whiddon v. Hutchinson
668 So. 2d 1368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
(1972), the Supreme Court explained the sudden emergency doctrine as follows: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of neglige
- Marigny v. Allstate Ins. Co. 667 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Arnold v. Airborne Freight Corp. 667 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Riles v. Truitt Jones Const.
648 So. 2d 1296
La. 1995
(1972), defines an independent contractor as one who has contracted for: ...
-
Midboe v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Empl.
646 So. 2d 351
La. 1994
However, the Commission stated that if Midboe's relationship with a firm, law firm or otherwise, was clearly that of an "independent contractor" , (1972), then that firm would not be restricted from assisting clients before DEQ.
-
Clement v. Griffin
634 So. 2d 412
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
(1972); Coleman v. State, through DOTD, (La.App.
-
Adams v. Greenhill Petroleum Corp.
631 So. 2d 1231
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
All parties agree that the Louisiana Supreme *1234 governs the main issue of whether an employer-employee relationship or a principalindependent contractor relationship existed between Greenhill and Lafitte.
- Berry v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 625 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Lewis v. Teacher's Pet, Inc.
621 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
*870 102, (1972), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfille
- Keeth v. STATE, EX REL. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & TRANSP. 618 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- White v. Frenkel 615 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA 613 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Gunn v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.
611 So. 2d 805
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Counsel for Hare attempted to have the trial judge read a , (1972).
- Gunn v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. 600 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Lafont v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. 593 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Loveday v. Travelers Ins. Co.
585 So. 2d 597
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Also, , (1972); Boutte v. Rig Hammers, Inc., (La.App.
-
Urbeso v. Bryan
583 So. 2d 114
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1986), , (1972).
-
Urbeso v. Bryan
583 So. 2d 114
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1986), , (1972).
-
Glover v. DIVING SERVICES INTERN.
577 So. 2d 1103
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-391 (1972): It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfilled in accordance with
-
Stovall v. Shell Oil Co.
577 So. 2d 732
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(1972); Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 227 La.
-
Stutes v. Rossclaire Construction, Inc.
575 So. 2d 466
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfi
- Davenport v. Amax Nickel, Inc. 569 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Nicholas v. Voiron 568 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
Parker v. Boise Southern Co.
570 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the criteria for finding a principal-independent contractor relationship: "1.
-
Broadway v. State, Department of Transportation & Development
567 So. 2d 776
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(1972), described the sudden emergency doctrine in the following terms: “One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence i