Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co., 262 So. 2d 385.

233 citing documents.

  • King v. Danna 784 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Jackson v. Scott Truck and Tractor, Inc., supra; Traweek v. Jackson, 30,248 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), ; Jackson v. Town of Grambling, 29,198 and 29,199 (La.App.2d Cir.2/26/97), .
  • Moreno v. Simonton 779 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    (1972), defines an independent contractor as one who has contracted for: ...
  • Cliburn v. Police Jury Ass'n of Louisiana 770 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In making the determination that Cliburn was an employee of the Police Jury, , (1972), mandated a finding of employee status.
  • Campbell v. HOSPITAL SERV. DIST. NO. 1, CALDWELL PARISH 768 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    (1972); Roberts v. State, Through La.
  • Buckley v. Vess Beverage, Inc. 759 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The factors that must be met to establish a , (1972), (La.App.
  • MacK v. CDI CONTRACTORS INC. 757 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • Bellard v. Castille 759 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    (1972) that: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfilled in accordance
  • Crews v. Blalock 746 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • City of Shreveport v. KINGWOOD FOREST 746 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Wiley v. Safeway Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Co., , (1972), citing the following passage: [O]ne who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what sub
  • Prater v. Porter 737 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • Ledent v. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. 723 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    (1972); Smith, supra; Morales, supra; Perkins v. Gregory Mfg.
  • Kaufman v. City of New Orleans 720 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • Netecke v. State ex rel. DOTD 715 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Remet v. Martin 705 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Cooper v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 699 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    (1972), as follows: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequently and upon reflec
  • Barron v. Webb 698 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    (1972), the supreme court defined an independent contractor as one who has contracted for: ...
  • Cooley v. Benson Motor Co. of New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Transport Co., , -391 (La.1972).
  • Jackson v. Town of Grambling 690 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Teel v. Superior Scrap Metals 675 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    at 390-391 as follows: [one who has contracted for] a specific piecework as a unit to be done according to the independent contractor's own methods, without being subject to the control and direction, in the performance of the service, of his employer ...
  • Bob v. Benoit 673 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    *1323 |4The court, , described the independent-contractor relationship, as follows: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the co
  • Doucet v. Doug Ashy Bldg. Materials, Inc. 671 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    (1972); Swan v. Vernon Mill.
  • Perkins v. Gregory Mfg. Co. 671 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Olivier v. Best Workover, Inc. 669 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5th Cir.1983), writ denied, , (1972).
  • Whiddon v. Hutchinson 668 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    (1972), the Supreme Court explained the sudden emergency doctrine as follows: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of neglige
  • Marigny v. Allstate Ins. Co. 667 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Arnold v. Airborne Freight Corp. 667 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Riles v. Truitt Jones Const. 648 So. 2d 1296 La. 1995
    (1972), defines an independent contractor as one who has contracted for: ...
  • Midboe v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Empl. 646 So. 2d 351 La. 1994
    However, the Commission stated that if Midboe's relationship with a firm, law firm or otherwise, was clearly that of an "independent contractor" , (1972), then that firm would not be restricted from assisting clients before DEQ.
  • Clement v. Griffin 634 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    (1972); Coleman v. State, through DOTD, (La.App.
  • Adams v. Greenhill Petroleum Corp. 631 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    All parties agree that the Louisiana Supreme *1234 governs the main issue of whether an employer-employee relationship or a principalindependent contractor relationship existed between Greenhill and Lafitte.
  • Berry v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 625 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Lewis v. Teacher's Pet, Inc. 621 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    *870 102, (1972), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfille
  • Keeth v. STATE, EX REL. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & TRANSP. 618 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • White v. Frenkel 615 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA 613 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Gunn v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. 611 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Counsel for Hare attempted to have the trial judge read a , (1972).
  • Gunn v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. 600 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Lafont v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. 593 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Loveday v. Travelers Ins. Co. 585 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    Also, , (1972); Boutte v. Rig Hammers, Inc., (La.App.
  • Urbeso v. Bryan 583 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1986), , (1972).
  • Urbeso v. Bryan 583 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1986), , (1972).
  • Glover v. DIVING SERVICES INTERN. 577 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    -391 (1972): It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfilled in accordance with
  • Stovall v. Shell Oil Co. 577 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    (1972); Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 227 La.
  • Stutes v. Rossclaire Construction, Inc. 575 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfi
  • Davenport v. Amax Nickel, Inc. 569 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • Nicholas v. Voiron 568 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • Parker v. Boise Southern Co. 570 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the criteria for finding a principal-independent contractor relationship: "1.
  • Broadway v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 567 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    (1972), described the sudden emergency doctrine in the following terms: “One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence i