DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co., 262 So. 2d 385.

233 citing documents.

  • Robicheaux v. Tate 111 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Hughes , 01-2107 at p. 6, 836 So.2d at 656 , , (1972).
  • Gaddy v. Universal Cable Systems, Inc. 131 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Transport Co., , (1972), which denoted what constitutes an independent contractor relationship.
  • Theodore v. Krazy Korner 95 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Loftus v. Kuyper 87 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Transport Co., , (1972).
  • George McGrew v. Quality Carriers, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Rather, 6 and consider that a contract’s content is not the determinative factor in deciding whether one is an employee or independent contractor.
  • McGrew v. QUALITY CARRIERS, INC. 74 So. 3d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Rather, 17 , (1972) and consider that a contract’s content is not the determinative factor in deciding whether one is an employee or independent contractor.
  • Certified Cleaning & Restoration, Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    -91 (La.1972); Honeycutt v. Deutschmann, 07-211, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Hulbert v. Democratic State Central Committee of Louisiana 68 So. 3d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Tower Credit v. Carpenter, 01-2875, p. 6 (La.9/4/02), , , -91 (1972).
  • Steinfelds v. Villarubia 53 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Jeansonne v. SCHMOLKE 40 So. 3d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    -91 (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court described the nature of an independent contractor relationship: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibili
  • Saylor v. VIGUET 30 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Transport Co., -113 , (La.
  • Williams v. Dutchtown Pharmacy, L.L.C. 24 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • White v. Frederick 17 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • McLeod v. Moore 7 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Transport Co., , (1972).
  • Triventies Johnson v. State Farm Ins. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Our Louisiana Supreme Court, -13, (1972), stated the following: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if h
  • Johnson v. State Farm Ins. 8 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Our Louisiana Supreme Court, -13 , (1972), stated the following: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequent
  • Billy Kibodeaux v. Progressive Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Kibodeaux v. Progressive Ins. Co. 4 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Transport Co., , (1972).
  • Tate v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 4 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    -117 , (1972), the plaintiff argues that a written contract is a sine qua non of an independent contractor relationship and that there is no written contract in the instant case.
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LeRouge 995 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Co., 51386 (La.5/1/72), , , 389: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequently and upon reflection may appear to
  • Angle v. Dow 994 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    -391 (1972), as follows: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfilled in
  • Ellerbe v. Albertsons, Inc. 989 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Transport Co., , (1972).
  • Course v. Fox Wolff Const. 987 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    (1972); Whitlow, supra at 668 .
  • Forbes v. Cockerham 985 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    [21] , (1972); Barbay v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
  • Honeycutt v. Deutschmann 976 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • Mize v. VAN METER, MD & ASSOCIATES 973 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    -391 (1972), as follows: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor in case the agreement is not fulfilled in
  • Arroyo v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 956 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • White v. Shell Exploration & Production Co. 951 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • David Dorsey v. Sewerage District No. 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Both sides look to the same case, So.2d 385 (1972), as the authority for the elements that distinguish an independent contractor from an employee.
  • Hartman v. Carco, Inc. 942 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has set out similar guidelines, if not more detailed, , (1972).
  • Manno v. Gutierrez 934 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    (1972); Barbay v. Aetna Cas.
  • Rodney Brack v. Michael A. Ferrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Brack v. Ferrington 924 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Phipps v. Allstate Ins. Co. 924 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 12/30/03) , -784 , , (1972).
  • Jackie Mouton v. We Care Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    -18, -91 (La.1972) (emphasis added) (citation omitted) as follows: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on
  • Mouton v. We Care Homes, Inc. 915 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    -18 , -91 (La.1972) (emphasis added) (citation omitted) as follows: It is well understood by the courts of this State that the term independent contractor connotes a freedom of action and choice with respect to the undertaking in question and a legal responsibility on the part of the contractor i
  • Elmore v. Kelly 909 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    (1972), the supreme court found the following factors relevant in determining whether the relationship of principal and independent contractor existed: (1) there is a valid contract between the parties; (2) the work being done is of an independent nature such that the contractor may employ non-exclusiv
  • Wilson v. Transportation Consultants, Inc. 899 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Sims v. Cefolia 890 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Transport Co., , -391 (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court found the following factors relevant in determining whether the relationship of principal and independent contractor exists: 1) there is a valid contract between the parties; 2) the work being done is of an independent nature such that the contractor may emp
  • LaFleur v. Martin 890 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Transport Co., , (1972), as follows: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequently and upon reflec
  • Hood v. Sartor 882 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    668 So.2d at 1375 , , (1972).
  • Lee v. Davis 864 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Transport Co., , (1972), as follows: One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequently and upon reflec
  • Stanley Richard Gordon v. Glen Hurlston, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    the supreme court found the following factors relevant in determining whether the principal-independent contractor relationship exists, so as to relieve the employer from liability for the tortious acts of its employee: (1) there is a valid contract between the parties; (2) the work being done is of an
  • Gordon v. Hurlston 854 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    *472 (1972), the supreme court found the following factors relevant in determining whether the principal-independent contractor relationship exists, so as to relieve the employer from liability for the tortious acts of its employee: (1) there is a valid contract between the parties; (2) the work being
  • Hughes v. Goodreau 836 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Fleming v. Acadian Geophysical Services, Inc. 827 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carpenter 825 So. 2d 1125 La. 2002
    (1972), this court found the following factors relevant in determining whether the relationship of principal and independent contractor exists: (1) there is a valid contract between the parties; (2) the work being done is of an independent nature such that the contractor may employ nonexclusive means i
  • Nunez v. Loomis Fargo & Co. 807 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Hillman v. Comm-Care, Inc. 805 So. 2d 1157 La. 2002
  • Powell v. Fuentes 786 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    (1972); Roberts v. State, Through La.