Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Curry, 263 So. 2d 36.
-
State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
So.2d 36 (1972); State v. Landry, 262 La.
-
State v. Melancon
563 So. 2d 913
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
692, 702 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690, 702 (1975); , (1972).
-
State v. Smith
554 So. 2d 676
La. 1989
(1972); State v. Landry, 262 La.
-
State v. Hamilton
356 So. 2d 1360
La. 1978
(1972); State v. Landry, 262 La.
- State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
-
State v. Unzueta
337 So. 2d 1102
La. 1976
(1972); State v. Dennis, 250 La.
-
State v. West
319 So. 2d 901
La. 1975
Art. 774; State v. Kaufman, La., (1974); , (1972).
-
State v. Lepkowski
316 So. 2d 727
La. 1975
(1972); State v. Landry, 262 La.
-
State v. Kaufman
304 So. 2d 300
La. 1974
(1972); State v. Landry, 262 La.
-
State v. Flood
301 So. 2d 637
La. 1974
(1972); State v. Poland, 255 La.
-
State v. Washington
292 So. 2d 234
La. 1974
See, e. g., State v. Enloe, La., (1973); , (1972); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
-
State v. Washington
292 So. 2d 234
La. 1974
See, e. g., State v. Enloe, La., (1973); , (1972); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
-
State v. Stevenson
292 So. 2d 488
La. 1974
See, e. g., State v. Enloe, La., (1973); , (1972); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
-
State v. Edwards
287 So. 2d 518
La. 1973
475 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Amphy, 259 La.
-
State v. Womack
283 So. 2d 708
La. 1973
See, e. g., State v. Enloe, La., (1973); , (1972); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
-
State v. Richmond
284 So. 2d 317
La. 1973
(1972); State v. Washington, 256 La.
-
State v. Taylor
282 So. 2d 491
La. 1973
475 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Millsap, 258 La.
-
State v. Foy
278 So. 2d 38
La. 1973
*41 , (1972); State v. Douglas, 256 La.
-
State v. Richmond
278 So. 2d 17
La. 1973
(1972); State v. Poland, 255 La.
-
State v. Scott
278 So. 2d 121
La. 1973
475 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Amphy, 259 La.
-
State v. Enloe
276 So. 2d 283
La. 1973
(1972); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
- State v. Green 275 So. 2d 184 La. 1973
-
State v. Johnson
268 So. 2d 620
La. 1972
The first two bills raise the identical issues of whether or not the defendant’s motions to quash the petit jury,,, venire and for a , (1972).
- State v. Heard 268 So. 2d 628 La. 1972
-
State v. Hamilton
264 So. 2d 605
La. 1972
The first two bills raise the identical issues of whether or not the defendant’s motions to quash thé petit jury venire and for a , , May 18, 1972.
-
State v. Myles
264 So. 2d 589
La. 1972
The first two bills raise the identical issues of whether or not the defendant’s motions to quash the petit jury venire and for a change of venue were erroneously overruled as was presented and, , (1972).
- State v. Curry 264 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
-
State v. Willis
264 So. 2d 590
La. 1972
The first two bills raise the identical issues of whether or not the defendant’s motions to quash the petit jury venire and for a , (1972).
- State v. Flucas 264 So. 2d 586 La. 1972
- State v. McDaniel 264 So. 2d 587 La. 1972