Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 262 So. 2d 328.

165 citing documents.

In Re Succession of Wolf 943 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Verdin v. Rogers 926 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Babineaux v. Pernie-Baily[Bailey] Drilling Co., , (1972).
Ralph v. City of New Orleans 921 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.11/30/94), ( , (1972)).
Bank One, Nat. Ass'n v. Velten 917 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
-33 ; Landry v. Blaise, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
Vermilion Hospital, Inc. v. John Patout La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-97, - 34 (1972): There has been much discussion about the purpose of the exception of no right of action, and many attempts to differentiate that exception from the exception of no cause of action.
Vermilion Hosp., Inc. v. Patout 906 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-97 , -34 (1972): There has been much discussion about the purpose of the exception of no right of action, and many attempts to differentiate that exception from the exception of no cause of action.
Michael Joseph Viator v. Wendell R. Miller, Indiv. as in His Capacity as Judge for the 31st Judidical … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-97, - 34 (1972): There has been much discussion about the purpose of the exception of no right of action, and many attempts to differentiate that exception from the exception of no cause of action.
Viator v. Miller 900 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-97 , -34 (1972): There has been much discussion about the purpose of the exception of no right of action, and many attempts to differentiate that exception from the exception of no cause of action.
Patrick Jefferson Murphy v. Susie Lynn Book La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Murphy v. Murphy 889 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 3/26/03), ; , (1972).
Jackson v. Estate of Jones 887 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Day v. Morehouse General Hospital, 37,803 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writ denied, 04-0504 (La.4/8/04), ; Deal v. Powell, 37,686 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), , writ not considered, 04-0165 (La.3/19/04), ; , (1972).
FORUM FOR EQUALITY v. City of New Orleans 881 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
NEW ORLEANS REDEVELOPMENT AUTHOR. v. Lucas 881 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
-33 ; Landry v. Blaise, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
Fleet Fuel, Inc. v. Mynex, Inc. 877 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
art. 927; Greenbriar Nursing Home, Inc., supra ; , (1972).
Tri-State Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Cox 871 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), ; , (1972).
Cook v. Hibernia National Bank 869 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, pp. 4-5 (La.11/30/94), , , (1972).
Mendonca v. Tidewater Inc. 862 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
See also Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), ; , (1972).
Harvey v. Cole 845 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Barrow v. Norwest Mortgage Corp. 844 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
art. 927 A(5); , (1972).
Alden v. Lorning 842 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
(1972), the exception of no right of action raises two possible questions: (1) whether the plaintiff belongs to the particular class in whose favor the law extends the remedy, and (2) whether the plaintiff has the right to invoke the remedy which the law extends only conditionally.
Richard v. Milazzo 831 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Caddo-Bossier Parishes Port Commission v. Arch Chemicals, Inc. 830 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
(1972), the Port contends that the exception of no right of action cannot be invoked to determine whether the right or remedy can be exercised against that defendant, but is only used to determine whether the plaintiff has a legal interest in the subject matter of the |Rlitigation.
Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans v. Shell New Orleans Federal Credit Union 828 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See also, , (1972); Simmons v. Templeton, 99-1978 (La.App.
Way v. Andries 819 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Babineaux v. Pernie-Baily[Bailey] Drilling Co., , (1972).
Centofanti v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. 819 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
1974); , (1972); L'Enfant, Civil Procedure, 31 La.L.Rev.
Catfish Cabin of Monroe, Inc. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company 811 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
art. 927 A(5); In Re Ewing, 34,413 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/01), ; , (1972).
VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 801 So. 2d 331 La. 2001
(1972) ("[I]nterlocutory orders overruling...
Foltmer v. James 799 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
the Louisiana Supreme Court listed two possible questions that can be raised by an exception of no right of action: (1) "whether the plaintiff belongs to the particular class in whose exclusive favor the law extends the remedy," or (2) "whether plaintiff has the right to invoke a remedy whic
In Re Succession of Ewing 781 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
art. 927 A(5); , (1972).
Hamilton v. Champagne 765 So. 2d 1052 La. 2000
Foster v. FA Richard & Associates, Inc. 732 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 1/30/96) , , writ not considered, 96-0569 (La.3/29/96), ; Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm'n, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), , 888 n. 3; , ...
Jefferson Downs Corp. v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 727 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Scott v. Division of Housing & Neighborhood Development 703 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Zatarain , at 1186; , (1972).
Kavanaugh v. Long 698 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
art. 929 A; , (1972); Martinez v. Breaux Mart Inc., 93-2257 (La.App.
Sharkey's Reef, Ltd. v. Polit 688 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Smith v. Succession of Trattler 681 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Senn v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. 679 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Avenue Plaza, LLC v. Falgoust 676 So. 2d 1077 La. 1996
332 *1080 (La.1972); See also Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
FGB Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Riedlinger 671 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Joe, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , (1972).
Williams v. Mumphrey 668 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm'n, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), , 888 n. 3
Buller v. Falcon Rice Mill, Inc. 664 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Herndon v. Southwestern Electric Power Co. 655 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Anderson v. Collins 648 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
(1972), the supreme court provides a good discussion of the difference between the two exceptions: There has been much discussion about the purpose of the exception of no right of action, and many attempts to differentiate that exception from the exception of no *1377 cause of action.
La. Paddlewheels v. La. Riverboat Gaming 646 So. 2d 885 La. 1994
Boudreaux v. Entrekin 643 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Joe Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., , (1972).
Evans v. Waguespack 638 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Greenbriar Nursing Home, Inc. v. Pilley 637 So. 2d 429 La. 1994
(1972), quoting Henry G. McMahon, The Exception of No Cause of Action in Louisiana, 9 Tul.L.Rev.
Barca v. Reed 635 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
(1972) In his petition to annul the tax sales, plaintiff states the existence of the recorded tax sales; the fact that the subject property was owned by a third party; the fact that he holds a mortgage and vendor's lien and seeks the "rights of the owner" to annul the sales for lack of notice of the ta
Cox Cable v. City of New Orleans 624 So. 2d 890 La. 1993
Joe Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., , (1972).