Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Welkner, 253 So. 2d 192.

17 citing documents.

Bazley v. Tortorich 397 So. 2d 475 La. 1981
State v. Boniface 369 So. 2d 115 La. 1979
40:961 et seq., , (1971)).
State v. Jewell 345 So. 2d 1166 La. 1977
-27 (La.1973), , (1971).
City of Monroe v. Noe 340 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
(1971); State v. O'Dell, 253 La.
Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. BD. OF COM'RS FOR ATCHAFALAYA BASIN LEVEE DIST. 306 So. 2d 707 La. 1975
Louisiana Independent Auto Dealers Ass'n v. State 295 So. 2d 796 La. 1974
295 , (1972); , (1971); A & M Pest Control v. LaBurre, 247 La.
State v. Scott 278 So. 2d 121 La. 1973
State v. Roberts 278 So. 2d 56 La. 1973
A motion to quash, filed on September 16, 1971, was sustained on March 1, 1972, , (1971), which declared Act No. 457 of 1970 unconstitutional insofar as it purported to regulate amphetamines, barbiturates, and hallucinogens.
State v. Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc. 270 So. 2d 547 La. 1972
Remembering that the Legislature could have amended the entire part or subpart containing these several sections of the Revised Statutes and that it chose rather to amend them section by section, I , (1971).
State v. Dudek 268 So. 2d 217 La. 1972
State v. Kent 264 So. 2d 611 La. 1972
Before he could be sentenced, however, , (1971), declaring unconstitutional that portion of Act 457 of 1970 which was to regulate amphetamines, barbiturates, and hallucinogens, including Tuinol.
State v. Sliger 261 So. 2d 643 La. 1972
Our recent decision *1006 , (1971), is principally relied on as authority for the point.
State v. Sliger 261 So. 2d 648 La. 1972
On this appeal the State concedes that, subsequent to the ruling of the district court, the part of the statute which proscribes the possession and use of LSD was held unconstitutional, , .
State v. Dooley 259 So. 2d 329 La. 1972
1 , , decided September 30, 1971, rehearing denied October 28, 1971, we held Act 457 of 1970 “unconstitutional insofar as it purports to regulate amphetamines, barbiturates, and hallucinogens” to the extent that they are regulated by Subpart D of Part X of Chapter 4 of Title 40 of the Revised Statutes.
State v. Bajoie 257 So. 2d 686 La. 1972
Smith v. Department of Public Safety 254 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
* *" To the extent that the body of an Act contains provisions not indicated by the title, the act is unconstitutional and cannot be given effect; , (1971).
Followed State ex rel. Harris v. Henderson 253 So. 2d 378 La. 1971
rehearing .refused October 28, 1971.