DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Federal Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of No. Amer., 263 So. 2d 871.

66 citing documents.

  • Sheila Broussard Guidry v. Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    (1972) (Tate, J., concurring); Sylvester v. Fontenot, 10–1115 (La.App.
  • Rain Cii Carbon, LLC v. Turner Industries Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    Co. of N. Am., (1972)), the supreme court recognized the “long-standing rule” that when “‘a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his damages
  • Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America , , 512, , 872 (1972) ; see also La.
  • Wilson v. Two SD, LLC 186 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1990); , (1972); Illinois Cent.
  • McClellan v. Premier Nissan, L.L.C. 167 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Duer & Taylor v. Blanchard, Walker, O’Quin & Roberts, , (1972); Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman, 231 La.
  • Barbara Houssiere v. Asco USA La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    We recognize the long-standing rule that „„when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his damages in either of the two actions.‟‟ Federal Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, et al., So.2d 871, 872 (1972).
  • Houssiere v. ASCO USA 108 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    urt held, in pertinent part: We recognize the long-standing rule that "when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual *803 relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his damages in either of the two actions.” Federal Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, et al., , (1972).
  • Udomeh v. Joseph 103 So. 3d 343 La. 2012
    26B So.2d 871, 875 (1972) (Tate, J., concurring); Sylvester v. Fontenot, 10-1115 (La.App.
  • Mentz Construction Services, Inc. v. Poche 87 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Co. of North America, , (1972).
  • Petchak v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 55 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Baugh v. Parish Government Risk Mgmt.
  • Louisiana Alligator Wholesale, Inc. v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale Distributors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    (1972), the supreme court addressed this argument, explaining: It has been recognized by this Court on [numerous] occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a [contractual] relationship, the former may have two remedies
  • Louisiana Alligator Wholesale, Inc. v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale Distributors, Inc. 981 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    (1972), the supreme court addressed this argument, explaining: It has been recognized by this Court on [numerous] occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a [contractual] relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an act
  • Old Spanish Trail Credit Union v. Felix Elbert Sexton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    We recognize the long-standing rule that “when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his damages in either of the two actions.” Federal Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, et al., So.2d 871, 872 (1972).
  • Old Spanish Trail Credit Union v. Sexton 941 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    03), , stated: We recognize the long-standing rule that “when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his damages in either of the two actions.” Federal Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, et al., , (1972).
  • Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    (1972), the Court noted that when one has a contractual relationship with another and claims to have been damaged by the conduct arising out of that contractual relationship, two remedies exist: one in contract and another tort; the damaged party may elect to recover his damages in either tort or contr
  • Travis Cooper v. Louisiana Deptartment of Public Works La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Cooper v. La. Dept. of Public Works 870 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Co. of N. Am., et al., , (1972).
  • Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
    Federal Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, et al., , (1972).
  • Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Horton 756 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    (1972), where the court stated: It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover
  • INS. STORAGE POOL v. Parish Nat. Bank 732 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    (1972); United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Cargill, Inc., 612 So.2d at 785-786 .
  • Baugh v. PARISH GOV'T RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY 715 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • Guste v. Hibernia Nat. Bank in New Orleans 655 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    In support of their claim that the trial court erred in finding that their petition sounded only in tort, , (1972).
  • Ridge Oak Development, Inc. v. Murphy 641 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    1 Cir.1992); See also: , (1972).
  • Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE 615 So. 2d 318 La. 1993
  • United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Cargill, Inc. 612 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
  • Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Smith 552 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Stephens v. International Paper Co. 542 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • Starns v. Emmons 538 So. 2d 275 La. 1989
    Duer & Taylor v. Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts, , (1972); Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman, 231 La.
  • Alarcon v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 538 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • Comeaux v. Poindexter 527 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Richardson v. Hubbs 525 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 520 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    (1972); Franklin v. Able Moving & Storage Co., Inc., (1st Cir.1983).
  • Starns v. Emmons 524 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Duer & Taylor v. Blanchard, Walker, etc., , (1972); Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman, 231 La.
  • Reine v. Grillot 505 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • Aetna Ins. Co. v. Naquin 478 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • Versai Management, Inc. v. Monticello Forest Products Corp. 479 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Yandle v. STAN WEBER AND ASSOC., INC. 466 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    (1972), our Supreme Court reiterated established guidelines in determining the appropriate prescriptive period in circumstances as are found in the instant case: It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a
  • Ehrensing v. Stan Weber & Ass'n 466 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (1972), our Supreme Court reiterated established guidelines in determining the appropriate prescriptive period in circumstances as are found in the instant case: It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a
  • Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. 454 So. 2d 1081 La. 1984
  • Thompson v. Cane Gardens Apartments 442 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    (1972), stated: "It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractural [sic] relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his dam
  • General American Oil Co. of Texas v. Meche 442 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1972) which provides: “that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his damages in either of the two actions.” But counsel failed to c
  • Gunter v. Plauche 439 So. 2d 437 La. 1983
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartzog Realty & Construction Co. 439 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Franklin v. Able Moving & Storage Co., Inc. 439 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1972); Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc., (La.App.
  • Julien v. Wayne 415 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    (1972); Bernard v. Air Logistics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Veazey v. WT Burton Industries, Inc. 407 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Bernard v. Air Logistics, Inc. 407 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    (1972), the Supreme Court said: "It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractual relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to r
  • Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc. 397 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981