DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., 268 So. 2d 656.

24 citing documents.

  • Rance v. Harrison Co., Inc. 737 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    See Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , 263 La.
  • Kirkland v. Riverwood Intern. USA, Inc. 681 So. 2d 329 La. 1996
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972) (Tate, J., concurring).
  • Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1135 La. 1996
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972) (Tate, J., concurring).
  • Vickers v. Cajun Concrete Services, Inc. 634 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    NOPSI argues that the court must make a precursory finding that Sizeler is not a vendee because according to Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972) a vendee is not immune in tort to the employees of its vendor who are injured by the vendee's negligence.
  • Davenport v. Texaco, Inc. 623 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Broussard v. Heebe’s Bakery, Inc.
  • McCorkle v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 457 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972).
  • Lewis v. Exxon Corp. 441 So. 2d 192 La. 1983
    Johnson v. Alexander, supra at 454; Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., -73 , (1972); 1C A. Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation § 49.00 (1982); W. Malone & H. Johnson, Workers' Compensation, supra.
  • Lewis v. Exxon Corp. 417 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972)."
  • Sassau v. Louisiana Workover Service, Inc. 418 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    23:1032, 23:1062; Broussard v. Heebe’s Bakery, Inc., , (1972).
  • Slaughter v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. 415 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    23:1101; Broussard v. Heebe’s Bakery, Inc., , (1972); Pullig v. Shreveport Packing Company, Inc. of Kansas, (La.App.
  • James v. Ace Freight Line, Inc. 411 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972), the court also held (as noted by defendants) that the workmen’s compensation statute does not apply where the transaction between the claimant’s immediate employer and the person sought to be held liable as his employer is that of purchase and sale or where some other relationship other than th
  • Klohn v. Louisiana Power & Light 406 So. 2d 577 La. 1981
    [3] Although there seems to have been at least some question in the past as to whether tort immunity should be extended to a principal [ , (1972), Tate, J., concurring at 263 La.
  • Johnson v. Alexander 406 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    23:1061; Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972) ; Liles v. Riblet Products of Louisiana, Inc., supra."
  • Traylor v. Shell Oil Co. 400 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972).
  • Lyon v. Cobena 391 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    In dismissing plaintiff’s suit the trial judge relied on Broussard v. Heebe’s Bakery, Inc., concluding that the relationship between Cobena and Brown’s Velvet was nothing more than a vendor-vendee relationship as opposed to principal and contractor.
  • Barnes v. Sun Oil Co. 362 So. 2d 761 La. 1978
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972).
  • Vincent v. Ryder Enterprises, Inc. 352 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    23:1061; Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972); Liles v. Riblet Products of Louisiana, Inc., supra.
  • Burse v. BOH BROTHERS CONST. CO. 349 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972).
  • Jones v. Francis Romero, Inc. 345 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    The second argument advanced by plaintiff on appeal is that this court should not follow the Louisiana Supreme Court holding in Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972), wherein the majority held that under section 1061, a defendant found to be a "statutory employer" was granted tort immunity from a party found to be a "statutory employee".
  • Pullig v. Shreveport Packing Co., Inc. of Kansas 342 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    23:1032; Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972)
  • Wofford v. Dow Chemical Co. 335 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    * * *" ( 53 So.2d at 144 ) *538 The Benoit case remains the law today, even though its holding was vigorously opposed by amicus curiae, the Louisiana Trial Lawyers Association, in Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc., , (1972).
  • Haas v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company 321 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • Kontomitras v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 314 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • Hart v. Richardson 272 So. 2d 316 La. 1973
    In Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc. et al., La., , we recently found that the furnishing of pastries by one bakery to another formed a vendor-vendee relationship, and not that of principal-contractor.