Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., 270 So. 2d 512.

36 citing documents.

Succession of Miriam Mandel Sklar La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
Plaquemines Port, Harbor and Terminal District v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development and Plenary Infrastructure … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
See Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., So.
Succession of Abner L. Tritt v. South Johnson Street Holdings, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
The Court further noted that an “‘[i]njunction may be used to prevent but not to correct the wrong; it cannot be employed to redress an alleged consummated wrong or undo what has already been done.’” Fidelity Bank, 2020-0241, p. 7, 2020 WL 5939215, *3 (quoting Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., (1972)).
Linda Kocher v. Truth In Politics, Inc., And Causeway Connection Pac La. 2020
In Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., So.2d 512, 513 (1972), t he supreme court explained that in cases of injunctive relief, it is clear that when the activity which a plaintiff seeks to enjoin has already occurred during the pendency of the suit, the matter is moot as courts “will not review a case where only injunctive relief is sought when th
Fidelity Bank v. the Succession of Geraldine O. Dowden La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 1985) “Injunction may be used to prevent but not to correct the wrong; it cannot be employed to redress an alleged consummated wrong or undo what has already been done.” Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., (1972).
Jarquin v. Blanks 254 So. 3d 10 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/12/08), 980 So.2d at 786 (citation omitted); see also Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc. , 1078, (1972) ("Injunction may be used to prevent but not to correct a wrong; it cannot be employed to redress an alleged consummated wrong or undo what has already been done."); Crowe v. Eagle Bend Development, Partnership, , 1101-1102 (La.
Stevens v. St. Tammany Parish Government 212 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , (La.
Enmon Enterprises, LLC v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Aviation Board 194 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
the Louisiana Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
State of Louisiana v. Carolyn Deal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Constractors, Inc., So.2d 512 (La.1972).
State v. Deal 150 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Camillus Specialty Hospital, L.L.C. v. Riccio 133 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
This rule was succinctly stated by the Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Jarrott v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners 19 So. 3d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
This rule was succinctly stated by our Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Limousine Livery v. a AIRPORT LIM. SERVICE 980 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
and Dev., (citing Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , (1972)).
Captain William Woods v. Ruth Fontenot, Mayor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
This rule was succinctly stated by our Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., So.2d 512 (1972).
Wood v. Fontenot 896 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
This rule was succinctly stated by our Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Carbo v. City of Slidell 844 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , (1972); Gray v. State, Dep't of Highways, 250 La.
Chotin Transportation, Inc. v. Harbor Towing & Fleeting, Inc. 804 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Boutte v. Lawrence 724 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
An injunction “cannot be employed to redress an alleged consummated wrong or undo what has already been done.” Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , see also Doré v. Jefferson Guaranty Bank, (La.App.
Robbins v. STATE, LAND OFFICE 704 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
See Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Brennan v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR UNIV. OF LOUISIANA SYSTEMS 691 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
This rule was succinctly stated by our Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Pipe Liners, Inc. v. Edenwald Contracting Co. 650 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Richardson v. Reeves 600 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
In Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , , 263 La.
Crowe v. Eagle Bend Development, Partnership 579 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Dore v. Jefferson Guar. Bank 543 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
OSC relies on the decision of our Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972), wherein the Court said that an "Injunction may be used to prevent but not to correct a wrong; it cannot be used to redress an alleged consumated wrong or undo what has already been done."
Strickland v. State ex rel. Office of the Governor 534 So. 2d 956 La. 1988
Strickland v. STATE EX REL. OFF. OF GOV. 534 So. 2d 956 La. 1988
Bristol Steel & Iron Works v. State 507 So. 2d 1233 La. 1987
Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
WHITNEY NAT. BANK v. Poydras Center Assoc. 468 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
This rule was succinctly stated by our Supreme Court in Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
Lauer v. City of Kenner 445 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
What was sought to be enjoined has now occurred, and we cannot enjoin a past event, Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Contractors, Inc., , (1972).
North Central Utilities, Inc. v. Walker Community Water Systems, Inc. 428 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc.
Taylor & Taylor Builders, Inc. v. Moore 393 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See and compare Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc.
Carimi v. Director, Department of Safety & Permits 384 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
See Upper Audubon Ass’n. v. Audubon Park Com’n., La.App., ; Verdum v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , .
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Guillory 335 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
In Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , *37 (1972) the Supreme Court refused to review a case where only injunctive relief was sought when the needs for that relief ceased to be a justiciable issue.
Upper Audubon Ass'n v. AUDUBON PARK COM'N 329 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
In Verdun v. Scallon Bros. Cont., Inc., , (1972) the district court granted plaintiff injunctive relief prohibiting excavation by defendant of mud located on plaintiff's land.
In Re Baer 310 So. 2d 537 La. 1975
(1972); Navarre v. Lafayette Parish School Board, 226 La.
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Louisiana Milk Commission 297 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc., , (1972) the Supreme Court refused to review a case where only injunctive relief was sought when the needs for that relief ceased to be a justiciable issue.