Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Douglas, 278 So. 2d 485.

131 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
d little guidance other than Johnson but note a statement from a Louisiana Supreme Court case that pre-dates Jackson v. Virginia: “For speech to constitute this conduct of inciting to riot, it must be a willful, intentional ‘endeavor’ to gain as an immediate result, and specifically from that speech, the participation of three or more persons in combination to do violence.”
State of Louisiana v. Eric Johnson aka/eric Dwayne Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(footnote omitted), in which the supreme court addressed the question of what kind of speech constitutes incitement: Since no one would seriously contend that actual participation in a riot is protected by the First Amendment, it would seem that actions or endeavors or conduct
State v. Johnson 186 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
An instructive Louisiana case is State v, Douglas, (footnote omitted),, in which the supreme court addressed the question of what kind of speech constitutes incitement: Since no one would seriously contend that actual participation in a riot is protected by the First Amendment, it would seem that actions or endeavors or conduct to procure or incite othe
State of Louisiana v. Bengy R. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
344, (1972), the supreme court found the trial did not err in denying a motion for directed verdict of acquittal based on the fact that the indictment charged the defendant with committing murder on January 14, 1970, and the coroner‟s report showed the victim died on January 15, 1970.
State v. Cooley 165 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
344 , (1972), the supreme court found the trial did not err in denying a *1256 motion for directed verdict of acquittal based on the fact that the indictment charged the defendant with committing murder on January 14, 1970, and the coroner’s report showed the victim died on January 15, 1970.
State ex rel. R.T. 748 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed a involving a First Amendment attack on the crime of inciting to riot.
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
(the proscribed speech must result from "a willful, intentional `endeavor' to gain as an immediate result, and specifically from that speech," the lawless conduct).
State v. Allen 440 So. 2d 1330 La. 1983
State v. Beavers 394 So. 2d 1218 La. 1981
State v. Gibson 391 So. 2d 421 La. 1980
Note, Criminal Procedure-Directed Verdict of Acquittal, 44 Tul.L.Rev.
State v. Moak 387 So. 2d 1108 La. 1980
State v. Peoples 383 So. 2d 1006 La. 1980
State v. Hochenedel, 253 La.
State v. Augillard 371 So. 2d 798 La. 1979
State v. Pittman 368 So. 2d 708 La. 1979
State v. Valentine 364 So. 2d 595 La. 1978
State v. Beavers 364 So. 2d 1004 La. 1978
State v. Banks 362 So. 2d 540 La. 1978
State v. Harvey 358 So. 2d 1224 La. 1978
State v. Williams 354 So. 2d 152 La. 1978
State v. Meunier 354 So. 2d 535 La. 1978
State v. Ashley 354 So. 2d 528 La. 1978
State v. Tucker 354 So. 2d 521 La. 1978
State v. Williams 354 So. 2d 562 La. 1978
this Court upheld the constitutionality of the statute now challenged by the defendant.
State v. Penson 351 So. 2d 1181 La. 1977
“If the court denies a defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the state’s case, the defendant may offer its evidence in defense.” this Court construed Article 778 at a time when it permited a directed verdict in jury trials.
State v. Gray 351 So. 2d 448 La. 1977
State v. Blackstone 347 So. 2d 193 La. 1977
State v. Schwander 345 So. 2d 1173 La. 1977
State v. Williams 343 So. 2d 1026 La. 1977
State v. Reeves 342 So. 2d 605 La. 1977
State v. Kinchen 342 So. 2d 174 La. 1977
In State v. Douglas, La., (1973), this Court held that in reviewing a motion for acquittal, this Court will reverse the conviction only when there is no evidence of the crime or an element of the crime.
State v. Baker 340 So. 2d 565 La. 1976
State v. Spot 340 So. 2d 1349 La. 1976
State v. Alexander 339 So. 2d 818 La. 1976
State v. Brown 339 So. 2d 6 La. 1976
this Court will find error in the trial court’s denial of a motion for a directed verdict and reverse the conviction only where there is no evidence of the crime or one of its essential elements.
State v. Otis 339 So. 2d 343 La. 1976
State v. Baker 338 So. 2d 1372 La. 1976
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
State v. Andrews 337 So. 2d 1175 La. 1976
State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1201 La. 1976
State v. Marks 337 So. 2d 1177 La. 1976
State v. Flowers 337 So. 2d 469 La. 1976
art. 778 (1966); [3] *474 (La.1973).
State v. Ledet 337 So. 2d 1126 La. 1976
State v. Speed 335 So. 2d 28 La. 1976
State v. Shores 334 So. 2d 193 La. 1976
P. art. 778, as amended, La.Acts 1975, No. 527, § 1
State v. Senegal 333 So. 2d 924 La. 1976
[and the cases to the same effect.]
State v. Bizette 334 So. 2d 392 La. 1976
as amended, La.Acts 1975, No. 527, § 1
State v. Lewis 332 So. 2d 223 La. 1976
State v. Butler 331 So. 2d 425 La. 1976
State v. Smith 332 So. 2d 773 La. 1976
and succeeding jurisprudence.
State v. Bartley 329 So. 2d 431 La. 1976
In State v. Douglas, La., (1973), this Court held that the denial of a directed verdict can be reversed on appeal only when there is no evidence of an essential element of the crime charged.