Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.
- Miles v. Perroncel 598 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Bealer v. National Tea Co. 597 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Westridge v. Poydras Properties 598 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
Morgan v. New Orleans Cold Storage
603 So. 2d 190
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
-
Scamardo v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co.
595 So. 2d 1242
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
as follows: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trier of fact, on review the appellate court should not disturb the factual finding in absence of manifest error ...
- Delacroix Corp. v. Jones-O'Brien, Inc. 597 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- Kepner v. Durham Life Insurance Co. 596 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Gaspard v. STATE, THROUGH DOTD 596 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Richard v. Borden, Inc. 597 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Hess v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets 595 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- Dugas v. Frederick 594 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Conner v. Conner 594 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Bergman v. NICHOLSON MGT. & CONSULTANTS 594 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- Cole v. Celotex Corp. 588 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Dryades Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Carrere 593 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Tarver v. Oliver H. Van Horn Co., Inc. 591 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Wilson v. US Fire and Cas. Co. 593 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- McLean v. Smith 593 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Legier v. Saacks
590 So. 2d 1341
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
as follows: When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trier of fact’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error ...
- Bourgeois v. Puerto Rican Marine Management, Inc. 589 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Glasper v. Henry 589 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Crockett v. Crockett 588 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Holmes v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA
587 So. 2d 750
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
the jurisprudence has been settled that an agent, officer or employee of a corporation may owe a duty to a third person which duty is a result of his employment relationship.
- King v. Western Club, Inc. 587 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Taylor v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 586 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Morris v. Sigur 584 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. 583 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- DeRosier v. South Louisiana Contractors 583 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Landmark Savings Bank v. Greenwald 582 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Landmark Sav. Bank v. Greenwald 582 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Moore v. Healthcare Elmwood, Inc. 582 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- Larkins v. Cage Contractors, Inc. 580 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Guillot v. Miller 580 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- AMKU TRUST v. Talley 580 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Gauthier v. Goux 579 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Morgan v. Schwegmann's Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 580 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 580 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
-
TRAINA PLUMBING & HEATING CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Palmer
580 So. 2d 525
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
: The reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and
- Bourgeois v. Roudolfich 580 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- Northern Assur. Co. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 580 So. 2d 351 La. 1991
- Hoffert v. Allstate Insurance Co. 579 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Bordelon v. Drake
578 So. 2d 1174
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Credibility It is surely axiomatic that the trial court is vested with great discretion in determining the credibility of witnesses
-
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc.
579 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
23:1032 which established the following criteria for imposing individual liability: 1.
-
Mike v. Maxwell
577 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Distefano v. Bell, supra
- Roberts v. Benoit 574 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
-
Revolta v. Barbe
576 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The court (of appeal) further erred in assessing credibility and weighing medical evidence as if the court of appeal were the trier of fact.” and then concluded its relatively brief (Virgil) opinion by saying: “Louisiana’s ...
- Richards v. American Oil & First Marketing Corp. 577 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991