Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.
- Linzay v. Haas Investment Co. 576 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Babin v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 576 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Blanchard v. Republic Insurance Group 576 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- Dmj v. Bgb 576 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Valiant Ins. Co. v. City of Lafayette 574 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- DeGruy v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. 573 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Manieri v. National Tea Co. 573 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Audubon Exploration v. Linder Oil Co. 573 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Claiborne v. Wilson 572 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Coleman v. US Fire Ins. Co.
571 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3 Cir.1979), writ den., (La.
- Le v. Johnstown Properties 572 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Hunter v. Benson Chevrolet Co. 572 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Distinguished
Cannon v. Cavalier Corp.
572 So. 2d 299
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
on remand , writ denied (La.
- Calhoun v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. 571 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Jones v. Johnson 572 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Eugene v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 570 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Barnhill v. Consol. Med., Disability & Life Trust 569 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Austin v. Howard Discount Stores, Inc. 569 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Jones v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 568 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Weber v. Brignac 568 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Cazenave v. Pierce 568 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Klemetsen v. H & R Block, Inc.
569 So. 2d 559
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(5th Cir.1984), writs denied, and
-
Scott v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket, Inc.
569 So. 2d 61
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
But an appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s factual finding unless it is “manifestly erroneous” or “clearly wrong.”
- McDonald v. New Orleans Private Patrol 569 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Nicholas v. Voiron 568 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Martinez v. Soignier 570 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
-
Allen v. IMTC, INC.
567 So. 2d 1155
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Canter [ v. Koehring ] supra [ ] at 724 [(La.1973)], Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
-
Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n
567 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
LBA's conduct will be considered a cause in fact of Mr. Pastor's harm if it in any way contributed to that harm.
- Jordan v. Taylor 568 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Housley v. Cerise 568 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Hanchey v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
570 So. 2d 2
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
- Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 567 So. 2d 569 La. 1990
- Burton v. Berthelot 567 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Harrington v. Velinsky 567 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- City of New Orleans v. Elms 566 So. 2d 626 La. 1990
- Troyer v. Webster Homes, Inc. 566 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
Soares v. Lewis
566 So. 2d 129
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Nu-Lite Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. Deckard & Treadaway Electric Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, (5th Cir.1986).
-
Karageorge v. Cole
565 So. 2d 502
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
on remand , writ denied *507 (La.
-
Dodson v. Webster Parish Police Jury
564 So. 2d 760
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Virgil v. American Guar.
-
Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co.
563 So. 2d 850
La. 1990
[*] we held that findings by a trial court or a jury of fault and causation of damage in an action brought under Civil Code article 2315 are factual findings that may be overturned on appeal only if they are clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.
-
Robertson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety
563 So. 2d 521
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
When trial testimony conflicts, the appellate court should not substitute its own evaluations of credibility and inferences of fact for those of the trial court, even if the reviewing court concludes that its evaluations and inferences are as reasonable as the trial court’s. Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra at 1333
- Bernard v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSN. & DEVELOPMENT 563 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Gulf Wide Towing, Inc. v. Associated Ins. Mgrs. 563 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Celestine v. US FIDELITY & GUR. CO. 561 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Coleman v. Rabon
561 So. 2d 897
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
on remand , writ denied (La.App.
- Burkett v. Honeyman 561 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Inc.
561 So. 2d 76
La. 1990
(the preservation of the proper allocation of functions between trial and appellate courts is one reason the appellate courts adhere to the manifest error standard of review).
-
Blue v. Schoen
556 So. 2d 1364
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
our review of the testimony does not disclose an abuse of the trial judge's discretion.
-
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
561 So. 2d 203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-28 (La.1973); -22 (La.App.