Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA 539 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Thibodeaux v. Audubon Insurance Co. 539 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Manifest error, in its simplest terms, means “clearly wrong.”
Bijou v. Circle K General, Inc. 539 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Soileau v. HCA HEALTH SERV. OF LA., INC. 539 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Allen v. Allen 539 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Blanchard v. Department of Transportation 538 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Logan v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 538 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
4th Cir.1986), writ denied (La 1979).
Ambrose v. Fluor Constructors, Inc. 537 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Morris v. Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp Resort 539 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Explained Eppling v. Eppling 537 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
is that even though the Appellate Court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable, it should not disturb reasonable findings of the trial court when there is conflict in the testimony.
Wise v. Dufresne 537 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Mintz v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York 537 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Broomfield v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 537 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Arceneaux v. Do *398 mingue
Trahan v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 536 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Manuel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 535 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Looney v. Looney 536 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Naquin v. Hile 536 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic 537 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Strain v. Mitchell Mfg. Co. 534 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Lenoir v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 535 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Wallace v. Upjohn Co. 535 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
La.Civ.Code art. 2315; (La.
Bernard v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 534 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Gregor v. Constitution State Ins. Co. 534 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Davis v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 534 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
LeBlanc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 533 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Grappe v. State, Dept, of Transp.
Walls v. Olin Corp., Inc. 533 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
The standard of appellate review as to a (La.
Whitty v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 533 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Daigle v. Donald M. Clement Contractor, Inc. 533 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Boutall v. Berthelot 532 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Coblentz v. North Peters Parking, Inc. 533 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Harris v. Pizza Hut, supra
Scroggins v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 533 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
: When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Wilkinson v. Sweeney 532 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
The standard in Louisiana for reviewing factual issues determined by a
Gardner v. Campbell 532 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
McLellan v. Leche 531 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Edwards v. Heiman 534 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Louisiana jurisprudence is clear that an appellate court may not overturn a decision by a trial court “in the absence of manifest error.”
Johnson v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 531 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Richard v. Mangion 535 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Gonzales v. Babco Farm, Inc. 535 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
on remand , writ denied (La.
Gonzales v. Barco Farm, Inc. 535 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Fuller v. US Aircraft Ins. Group 530 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Hutton v. Craighead 530 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Giorlando v. Northern Assurance Co. of America 529 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the standard for appellate review of factual findings was set forth: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding
Gottlieb v. Tulane Univ. of Louisiana 529 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
The standard of appellate review of a
LaMark v. NME Hospitals, Inc. 529 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Levens v. Commercial Union Insurance Companies 529 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Sufficiency and Preponderance of the Deposition Testimony Plaintiffs argue strenuously, without citing any authority, that the standard of review of deposition testimony is not manifest error”
Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Friar v. Caterpillar, Inc. 529 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
363 , (1965), disapproved, in part, , 722 n. 8 (La.
Gotro v. Town of Melville 527 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Vidrine v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 528 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Littleton v. Piazza 527 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988