Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Ballard v. Mook 550 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Landwehr v. Landwehr 547 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Cascio v. Continental Casualty Co. 547 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Ren-Car Leasing Co. v. Duncan 546 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guidry v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 546 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.’ , at page 724 (La.1973).
Dossett v. Hub City Bank & Trust Co. 546 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McCauley v. Chapman 546 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Snoke v. M & M DODGE, INC. 546 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
is as follows: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error."
Fontenot v. Fontenot 546 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
McLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 549 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Dwellingham v. Cooper 545 So. 2d 1046 La. 1989
Bienvenu v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 545 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Henderson v. Guillory 546 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
American Bank & Trust Co. of Coushatta v. McDowell 545 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
In re Civil Service Commission Layoff Investigation 546 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Humphrey v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 546 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Kelley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 545 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Bauchmoyer v. Spelta 548 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Bishop v. Nelson 544 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Professional Credit Service of New Orleans, Inc. v. Fichtel 544 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d.
Ben v. Alberto Culver/Sally Beauty Co. 544 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Allen v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., supra, 512 So.2d at 558 .
Jones v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 544 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Marcantel v. Breaux 544 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
at page 1333 (La.1978), where the court stated: “We said the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Frederick v. General Motors Corp. 544 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.’ , at page 724 (La.1973).
Colomb v. Frito-Lay, Inc. 544 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Distefano v. Bell 544 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Canter *572 v. Koehring Company, (La.
Doell v. Lachney 544 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
1978); Canter v. Koehring, Company
King v. Louviere 543 So. 2d 1327 La. 1989
Durand v. Horace Mann Life Insurance Co. 543 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Rosell v. Esco 539 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Aguillard v. Frank 542 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State ex rel. Hulin 543 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Manifest error, in its simplest terms, means “clearly wrong.”
Eldridge v. Bonanza Family Restaurant 542 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Marshall v. Duncan 542 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Garrett v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
Cabral v. Cabral 543 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Because the trial judge based his apparent determination that the items were gifts to the community for the use of both parties on the testimony of these witnesses, that determination can only be set aside if his credibility determination was manifestly erroneous, (La.App.
Guenther v. Zoning Appeals Bd. 542 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Burdis v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury 542 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court addressed the issue of when and under what circumstances the officer, agent, or employee of an employer or principal is liable to a third person, when injuries caused to such third person result from the breach of a duty imposed by his employer or principal upon the officer, agent, or empl
West v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
That rule, requires that the reviewing court give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed on review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations
STATE, DOTD v. Fakouri 541 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Pardee v. Natchitoches Parish Police Jury 539 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Manifest error, in its simplest terms, means “clearly wrong.”
Professional Credit Services of New Orleans, Inc. v. Skipper 543 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Mitchell v. Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. of Connecticut 540 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Gaffney v. Saenger Theatre Partnership, Ltd. 539 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co. 540 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Carney v. Lone Star Life Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guitreau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. 540 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Sparks v. TULANE MED. CTR. HOSP. & CL. 537 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Ditcharo v. Stepanek 538 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Thomas v. Thomas 539 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by