Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Freeman v. Thomas 472 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. Williams 471 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Carter v. Koehring, (sic) "
Sanchez v. Viccinelli Sheet Metal & Roofing Co. 473 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(La.1973) teaches that: ...
Foy v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 475 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Alford v. Jarrell 471 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Fine Iron Works v. Louisiana World Exposition 472 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Respondent contends that relators violated a (La.App.
Joseph v. Bohn Ford, Inc. 472 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Vanlangendonck v. Castilow 472 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
ring from an unofficial corner did not “show an exactitude required.” It is well settled that “[w]hen there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.”
Guillot v. Sentry Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Dixon 471 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Wear v. Ernest 472 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Since the issue in this case concerns a factual determination made by the trier *146 of fact, i.e., that the plaintiff was contribu-torily negligent in causing the accident, we must review the record using the “manifest error” standard of review, and their progeny.
Moore v. McDermott, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Boozer v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 470 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Core v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 471 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 967 La. 1985
RAYNE STATE BANK & TR. CO. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Such a : "The reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations an
Wise v. La. Dept. of Transp. & Development 470 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Greenhouse v. Southern Security Insurance Co. 469 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Succession of City v. Succession of Manuel 469 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Aymond v. Commercial Union Insurance Companies 469 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Allen v. Southern Security Insurance 470 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Esco v. Smith 468 So. 2d 1169 La. 1985
Land and Marine Services, Inc. v. Diablo Data Systems, Inc. of Louisiana 471 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Marine v. Cornwall Equities, Ltd. 472 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Blakeman v. Saenger Art Center, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Attaldo v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Fossier v. Mercy Hospital of New Orleans 469 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Walters v. Jacob 470 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Ramstack v. Krieger 470 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Howell v. State, Department of Transportation 467 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hunter v. Hunter 468 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Wilcox v. Park Amusements, Inc. 468 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hayes v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSPORT AND DEVELOPMENT 467 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Slaughter v. Slaughter 466 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Plaisance v. Highland Insurance Co. 467 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Desormeaux v. Eastin 467 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Barras v. Touchet 467 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Soileau v. Olin Corp. 467 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
as follows: “The reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is a conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review even though the appellate court may feel that its own e
Tipton v. Menard 467 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
our Supreme Court held that an appellate court should not disturb a trial court's findings of fact, even if based on conflicting testimony, where the evidence before the trier of fact furnishes a reasonably factual basis for the findings.
Sizeler v. Muller 467 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
[16] Since the rise to prominence of the "manifest error" it is the preference of the appellate court to receive written reasons for judgment.
Sigsworth v. Gernon 465 So. 2d 705 La. 1985
Collins v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 466 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Considering the primacy of the trial court in credibility evaluations and factual inferences in general, we disagree and therefore affirm.
Landry v. Schneckenberger 466 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Vazquez v. Davis 466 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Katz v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Greater New Orleans 466 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Ard v. City of Kenner 466 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Arnold v. TG & Y. STORES CO. 466 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways 466 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Dearmon v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 465 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985