Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Henry v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
Guillory v. Agee 465 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State ex rel. A.J. 465 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Williamson v. Diesi Service Station Corp. 465 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appel *189 late court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Reyes v. State 466 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Tate v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Sullivan v. Quick 465 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
VALLEY ELEC. MEMBERSHIP CORP., INC. v. Wallace 465 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Ward-Steinman v. Karst 465 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Ward-Steinman v. Karst 465 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Brents v. Gulf Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Brown v. Vince 464 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Kuswa & Associates, Inc. v. Thibaut Const. Co. 463 So. 2d 1264 La. 1985
In Re Whitaker 463 So. 2d 1291 La. 1985
in which this court stated: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Robertson v. First of Georgia Underwriters Co. 464 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hearns v. Orleans Parish School Board 464 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
estimony of pain and disabilities, although contradicted considerably as to the pain’s constancy, is supported by the medical testimony (including of cervical disc injury) to such an extent that we cannot say that the trial judge was “clearly wrong,” especially considering the trial judge’s primacy in evaluating credibility, in awarding plaintiff worker’s compensation benefits for permanent partial disability.
Bazile v. Arnaud Coffee Co. 465 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Under the "manifest error" we cannot conclude that the trial court was manifestly erroneous in its factual determinations.
Lemeshewsky v. Dumaine 464 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Brosset v. Childs Enterprises, Inc. 465 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Broussard v. Broussard 462 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1983) and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err in accepting the testimony of Mr. Broussard over that of Mrs. Broussard.
Quinn v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 464 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Fourroux v. North-West Ins. Co. 462 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Crochet, supra; Calais, supra; (La.
Hoffman v. CRAFTWORLD INTERN., INC. 463 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Long v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 463 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Morgan v. Morgan 462 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The facts support that the conduct of each would entitle the other to a legal separation, and accordingly, the Court finds mutual fault.” and conclude that the trial court did not clearly err in its grant of a separation on the ground of mutual fault.
Conly v. Town of Forest Hill 463 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
“When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Wheeler v. Clearview Dodge Sales 462 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
is as follows: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error."
Mills v. Sentry Ins. Co. 463 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error."
Hartman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 462 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Because these allegations involve factual issues, our standard of review is not whether we might have reached a different conclusion from the evidence, but whether the trial court committed manifest error in its findings of fact
Miller v. Upjohn Co. 465 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Article 2315 Civil Code; at 566 (La.App.
Malbrough v. Hamsa 463 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State in Interest of Cox 461 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Daigre v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 461 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
an appellate court should not disturb a finding of fact unless it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong."
Mulkey v. Stoney-Point Missionary Baptist Church 462 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Metzler v. Rising T Racing Stables 461 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Shaw v. Jet America Corp. 462 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Gin Saw Filing & Maintenance, Inc. v. Producers Mutual Gin Co. 459 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Thibodeaux v. Stagg 460 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court explained the basis for this principle: “When there is evidence before the trier of facts which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the ab
Landaiche v. Lou-Con 461 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Rodriguez v. Traylor 461 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Frost v. Albright 460 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 458 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
Efferson v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 463 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
LaSalle Pump & Supply Co. v. Louisiana Midland Railroad 459 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Carter v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana St. Univ. 459 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Jacobs v. Grayson, *1267 (La.App.
Buratt v. Capital City Press, Inc. 459 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
General Elec. Co. v. LA. ELEC. SUPPLY CO., INC. 460 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Williams v. Cortney Co. 459 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Veal v. Church's Chicken of New Orleans 459 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Arceneaux v. Dominque, supra.
Garrett v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 459 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
“Reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed on review ...”