Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Walters v. Dept. of Police of New Orleans 454 So. 2d 106 La. 1984
Bender v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket, Inc. 452 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Ducote v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 451 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Woodfield v. Dugas 450 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Price v. Price 451 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Carter v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 454 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Collins v. J.C. Penney Co. 450 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
We cannot say that the trial court’s evaluation of credibility was clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous, especially as Mrs. Collins’ testimony was evasive and self-contradictory.
Lodrigue v. Houma-Terrebonne Airport Commission 450 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
“When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.”
Horne v. Liberty Furniture Co. 452 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Thomas v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 451 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Boudreaux v. Exxon Co., USA 451 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Harper Oil Field Services v. Dugas 451 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Triangle Trucking Co. v. Alexander 451 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Alaynick v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Co. 451 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
It is apparent, therefore, that the trial court believed Alaynick, and not Lee, and where the credibility of two contradictory witnesses is at issue, this court will not disturb finding of fact based thereon, absent some manifest error
Pelt v. Guardsmark, Inc. 451 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
This court should determine whether the district court judgment is clearly wrong considering all the evidence, and it's progeny.
Tran v. Comet Construction Co. 450 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Schwendinger v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 451 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jefferson 448 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Granger v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Corp. 448 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
as follows: “Where there is evidence before the trier of fact, which upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error ...
Nicholson v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 449 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Duhon v. Slickline, Inc. 449 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Nicholson v. LA. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOP. 449 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
McFarland v. Texhoma Contractors, Inc. 449 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
and the long line of cases following thereafter: "Where there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absen
Thompson v. Gibbens Pools, Inc. 449 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
rt of Appeal must give great weight to the factual conclusions reached by the trial court; and ‘when there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, *175 on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.’ (La.
State Farm General Insurance Co. v. Kentwood Spring Water, Inc. 449 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mears v. Midco Louisiana Co. 449 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Owens v. Martin 449 So. 2d 448 La. 1984
that an injured worker could sue executive officers of his employer in negligence in addition to his workmen's compensation remedy against his employer.
Doss v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 448 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Grusich v. Grusich 447 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Shackman v. Daigle 447 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
LeBlanc v. Gibbens Pools, Inc. 447 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Johnson v. Continental Slip Form Builders 449 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Naulty v. Oupac, Inc. 448 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Duhon v. Trahan 446 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Thompson v. Alamo Glass Co. 446 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
a reviewing court must give great weight to the reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact made by the trial court.
Van Lieu v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana 446 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Barker v. Tangi Exterminating Co. 448 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mack v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 447 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Androwski v. Ole McDonald's Farms, Inc. 447 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Austen v. Sherwood 446 So. 2d 274 La. 1984
Herquet v. Ford 446 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Greenup v. Maginnis 446 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Adoption of Kitler v. Kitler 445 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Bushnell v. Artis 445 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Devillier v. N.L. Industries, Inc. 445 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
See also Canter v. Koehring [Co.]
Karam v. Ashworth 445 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Schepp v. Olin Corp. 445 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Senegal v. George Theriot's, Inc. 445 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Heyl v. Heyl 445 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State, in Interest of Quilter 445 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984