Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Jones v. Thibodeaux 445 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Leval v. Dugoni 444 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Smith v. Giarrusso 446 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Deleon v. Home Indemnity Co. 444 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Matthews v. Celotex Corp. 444 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 444 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
G/O ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Mid Louisiana Gas Co. 444 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Carbonell v. Department of Health & Human Resources 444 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Where the evidence in a disciplinary action is received by a referee and the Commission does not see or hear the witnesses
Kenney v. Cooper 444 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
MacKie v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 444 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Lincoln Big Three, Inc. v. Thomas 444 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Aizpurua v. Crane Pool Co., Inc. 439 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
and may not substitute our evaluations and inferences for the reasonable evaluations and inferences of the trier of fact unless those conclusions are clearly erroneous.
Richoux v. Hebert 449 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Guilbeau v. Roger 443 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Bertrand v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, (La.App.
Henry v. Pitre Ford Co. 442 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Mitchell v. South Central Bell 442 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Holmes v. Central Louisiana State Hospital 442 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
require that we give great weight to the trial court’s factual conclusions and should not disturb its findings in the absence of manifest error.
Hardee v. Tate & Sons, Inc. 442 So. 2d 1390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted on remand, (La.App.
Durr v. Beard 443 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Flamm v. Flamm 442 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Landry v. Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc. 443 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Ageous v. Allstate Insurance Co. 442 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Nodier 442 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Moak v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. 445 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Bush v. Lee 443 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Barkman v. Zoning Appeals Board 442 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State, Through Dept. of Highways v. Luling Indus. 443 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
and Arceneaux v. Domingue, et al.
Allan E. Amundson, Inc. v. Hoppmeyer 442 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
On this issue, we note that the rule as to factual findings by a trial court is that such findings will not be disturbed on appeal absent some manifest error, *1257
Caldwell v. Texas Industries, Inc. 441 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
McSweeney v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 442 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
at 723 (La.1973), rehearing denied 1973.
Vernon v. Aetna Life and Cas. Ins. Co. 442 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Allen v. Keeney 442 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Durbin v. Cockerham 442 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Thus, when reviewing the evidence.
Eschete v. Gulf South Beverages 442 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Kidd 442 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Reed v. Gulf Ins. Co. 436 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Smith v. Castro Bros. Corp. 443 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
The landlord also argues the basic credibility of the tenant, but that is the province of the trial judge
Fouchi v. Fouchi 442 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Baach v. Clark 442 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
`Stated another way, the reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review
Watson v. Louisiana Paving Co. 441 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Miller v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 441 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. SHAMROCK CONST. CO., INC. 441 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Faucheux v. Hooker Chemical Corp. 440 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Batiste v. Wiese 439 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
There was testimony relative to plaintiff’s diminished sexual capacity, social interests, etc., but these are not relevant considerations in this workmen’s compensation case.
Rome v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 439 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
This court will agree that the plaintiff, Mrs. Rome, was contributorily negligent because this court must give great weight to the factual conclusions reached by the trial court, and may not substitute its own evaluations and inferences, for the reasonable evaluations and inferences of the trier of fact, unless those conclusions are clearly erroneous.
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartzog Realty & Construction Co. 439 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Department of Corrections, Hunt Correctional Center v. Morgan 440 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
For that reason, does not apply.
2L Boats, Inc. v. Fred Settoon, Inc. 440 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wiltz Corp. v. Fred Settoon, Inc. 440 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Blount v. Peabody Shoreline Geophysical 439 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983