Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Miller v. Broussard 430 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Manuel Truck & Equip. Co. v. BG Hooker Pet. 430 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Dawson v. Bonfanti 430 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Andrus v. Lafayette Parish School Board 430 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Fulks v. Hargis 430 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
It is well established that a reviewing court will not disturb factual findings by a trial court unless those findings are manifestly erroneous
Mid-Gulf Construction, Inc. v. St. Charles Parish Police Jury 433 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. Eisman 430 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Martin v. Pala, Inc. 439 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
As the case was submitted on depositions, if we were to follow the holdings of other circuits, we would be compelled to refrain from applying the manifest error, clearly wrong test ( ), and to decide the case as trier of fact, (La.App.
Owens v. Martin 430 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Thum v. MRO Services Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
F & S OFFSHORE v. Serv. MacH. & Shipbuilding 430 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court set out the appropriate appellate standard of review of facts as follows: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation *1173 of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court shou
Abel v. White 430 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
We simply are not in a position to reverse the trial judge's credibility evaluation, and we therefore accept that plaintiff did not prove that he had moved to Louisiana prior to the insurer's renewal of his policy effective October 12, 1974.
Brown v. White 430 So. 2d 16 La. 1983
Davis v. Brown 430 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Young v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 430 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Johnson v. Morris 431 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Hogan Exploration v. Monroe Engineer. Assoc. 430 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Williams v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Horhn v. Bernie Dumas Buick, Inc. 429 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Tucker v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 429 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Atlee v. Stone & Webster Engineering, Inc. 428 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
dictates that we must give great weight to the trial court’s factual conclusions and should not disturb its findings in the absence of manifest error.
Mose v. Brewer 428 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
West Louisiana Petroleum Corp. v. Gunn 428 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Gardner v. Brown 428 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Juneau v. Garan, Inc., (La.App.
Rennier v. State, Through Dept. of Pub. Saf. 428 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Campagna v. Smallwood 428 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Samanie v. Bourg 434 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
239 , (1963); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Pomares v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 428 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
However, our review of the record fails to reveal any manifest error in the court’s findings, or any abuse of discretion in its damage award
Health Unlimited v. Loyola University 434 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Butts on Behalf of Walker v. Butts 428 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Explained Hills v. Skate Country East, Inc. 430 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Having reached this conclusion we are not in the position we were in the Phillips case to ignore, as it were
Dousson v. South Central Bell 429 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Brown v. McDonald's Corp. 428 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Scariano Bros. v. Hammond Const. 428 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
In re Succession of Godefroy 428 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
We prefaced this observation: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.” .
Provenzano v. Populis 428 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Busalacchi v. Vogel 429 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the appellate courts of this state were admonished that they should not disturb a trial court's factual findings in the absence of manifest error.
Samrow v. Samrow 428 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Forstall v. Hotel Dieu Hosp. 429 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Chapman v. Belden Corp. 428 So. 2d 396 La. 1983
Roussel v. Colonial Sugars Co., supra
King v. Taylor 428 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d *899 1330 (La.1978)
Chisolm v. Dibert, Bancroft & Ross Co. 428 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Coglaiti v. Bourg 428 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Murphy v. Murphy 427 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Drewes v. Giangrosso 429 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wallace C. Drennan, (La.App.
Walker v. Marcev 427 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Ducoing v. Carter 427 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Reeve v. Pizza Hut of America 427 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Gurst v. City of Natchitoches 428 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Waldon v. Baker 426 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Martin v. Western Preferred Casualty Co. 427 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.” Manifest error was interpreted b