Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Haas v. Estate of LeDoux 427 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Liberda v. Acadiana Roofing & Sheet Metal 427 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Hingle v. Audubon Ins. Co. 427 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
McKinnie v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 426 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Canter v. Koehring, Co., et al.
Hebert v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 426 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
Jones v. Thomas 426 So. 2d 609 La. 1983
Flettrich v. Jacob 427 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Geraci v. Southern Scrap Material Co. 425 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Jones v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. 425 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Taranto v. Cook 425 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
NEGLIGENCE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Defendants contend the criteria for imposing individual liability on an “executive officer” are not satisfied in this case.
Leinweber v. Chevron Chemical Co. Oronite Additives Division 427 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Mayeux v. Cane-Air, Inc. 426 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Schulze v. Perry 427 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Nero 425 So. 2d 730 La. 1983
Flood v. Hub Auto Parts, Inc. 425 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Reynolds, Nelson, Theriot & Stahl v. Chatelain 428 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
F & F TRANSFER, INC. v. Tardo 425 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
Lofton v. Whimper 425 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Theriot v. Lanier 425 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Albright v. Prentice 425 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
: *339 "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error."
Otto v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 426 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Courtesy Financial Services, Inc. v. Hughes 424 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Robertson v. Chrysler Corp. 424 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hunnicutt v. Kent 434 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Barnes v. Carmadelle 424 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
O’ Huisman v. Southern General Ins.
Randall v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Group 424 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Accordingly, we do not have to find manifest error, before setting aside the district court decree.
Majestic Floor Coverings, Inc. v. Lawson 424 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Gerard v. Parish of Jefferson 424 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Rye v. Terminix Service Co., Inc. 423 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Barnes v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 423 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Picton v. Sewerage & Water Board 423 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Two recent cases have held that the manifest error rule, is not applicable to Civil Service Commission proceedings before a Hearing Examiner.
Shelton v. Neal 423 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Ortego v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc. 423 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
at 724 (La.1973): When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Cabone v. Melba Ice Cream Co. 423 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Our answer is that our function as a reviewing court must concede the inescapable primacy of the trier of fact in factual issues and not substitute our judgment (even if equally reasonable) for his, and not alter quantum unless we can articulate an abuse of his “much discretion” within C.C.
Abraham v. Sperandeo 423 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
and reiterated in Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact, which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of m
Armstrong v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 423 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Pearce v. Rogers 423 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Raymond Through Raymond v. Deaton 423 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Dearing v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. 423 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McKneely v. Young 423 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Dickerson v. Taylor 424 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Williams v. United States P. & I. Agency, Inc. 424 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cotton v. Holden 422 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Warren v. Warren 423 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Counsel for appellee, Dr. Warren
Lott v. Burton 423 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Melancon v. Harrell 423 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Wheat v. Ford, Bacon and Davis Const. Corp. 424 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Payne v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
[3] This court must give great weight to the factual conclusions reached by the trial court, (La.
Everett v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Stewart v. Stewart 422 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982