Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

McDermott v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 420 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Mascaro v. Davis 420 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Schaeffer v. Duvall 421 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Cooperider v. Dearth 420 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The jury no doubt found fault both in excessive speed for the foggy condition and in following too close, and we cannot substitute our inferences for those reasonable inferences of the trier of fact
Bagents v. Bagents 419 So. 2d 460 La. 1982
McElroy v. Allstate Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
As an alternative specification of error, the appellants urge that the jury conclusion in this case, that there was no defect in the design of the Ford automobile, (La.
Richard v. Tulane Toyota, Inc. 419 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Parker v. Kroger's Inc., supra, (1st Cir. 1981).
Boyett v. Ingram 419 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Sweeney v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 419 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Universal Iron Works, Inc. v. Falgout Refrigeration, Inc. 419 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Louisiana Health Service & Indem. Co. v. Cole 418 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Explained Colburn v. Jordan 419 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hawkins v. Johns-Manville Corp. 418 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Braquet v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 419 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Bay v. Maggio 417 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cobb v. Matherne 418 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Wing v. Wing 418 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Veuleman v. O'CON 417 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Deville v. Port Pipe Terminal of Louisiana, Inc. 419 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
App. 1st Cir. 1980) and cases cited therein
Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. LeBlanc 417 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Brach v. McClanahan 417 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
minations: “Stated another way, the reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.”
Di Carlo v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 418 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Davis v. General Accident Insurance Co. 419 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra.
Devillier v. Devillier 417 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” (La.
Bell v. Bell 417 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3rd Cir. 1980) this Court reiterated the law concerning appellate review of factual issues: “
Ned v. National Fire & Marine Insurance 416 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Weimer v. Jenkins 417 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Corona v. Dunbar 417 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Johnson v. Louisiana State University 417 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Williams v. Offshore Food Service, Inc. 417 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Nettles v. Bowlin 417 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Suite 5-A/B Partnership v. DJF Co. 417 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Rogers v. Brown 416 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Purcell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 416 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
In addressing the first issue of whether plaintiff suffers from the occupational disease of asbestosis, which sets forth the standard by which this court must review the trial judge's factual finding that Mr. White suffers from asbestosis.
Adams v. Pourciau 417 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Bradley v. Tripkovich 415 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
We simply cannot say the trial judge was "clearly wrong," in the credibility evaluation that is his province, (La.
Harris v. Baham 417 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
and its numerous progeny.
Smith v. Alexander 415 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” at 724 (La., 1973).
Wyman v. West Jefferson General Hospital 416 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the Supreme Court stated: The reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there are conflicts in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed on review.
Sandridge v. Sunseri 416 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
where there is a reasonable evaluation of credibility, we should not disturb the trial judge’s conclusion because he, looking at live witnesses, as opposed to our looking at a cold record, is in a better position to evaluate the credibility of the witness.
Mills v. Ganucheau 416 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Succession of Catanzaro 417 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Alleman v. State, Dept. of Highways 416 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Foreman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. 416 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Musemeche v. G & J Mobile Home Ser. & Supplies 425 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Charpentier v. La. Land and Exploration Co. 415 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Donnelly v. Handy 415 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3d Cir. 1980); rehearing denied 1973.
Roberts v. Rolene Corp. 415 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Meche v. Arthur G. McKee & Co., Inc. 415 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Company, Inc., Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret *497 Co., Inc.