Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Nero 415 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Austin's Quick Print, Inc. v. Deferred Compensation Corp. of Louisiana 415 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Reach v. Matranga 415 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Johnson v. Byrne
415 So. 2d 369
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
First State Bank & Trust Company of East Baton Rouge Parish v. Dalton’s Heating & Air Conditioning Co., Inc., et al, (La.App.
-
Leger v. Cargill, Inc.
415 So. 2d 983
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Company, Inc., Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
- Griffin v. Littlefield 416 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Wes-T-Erre Dev. Corp. v. PARISH OF TERREBONNE, ETC. 416 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Rodrigue v. Matherne 416 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Lee v. Louisiana Transit Co.
414 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
at page 724, the Supreme Court set the standard of review as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the a
- Costello v. Spalitta 414 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Reese v. Reese 414 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Grigsby v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets, Inc.
417 So. 2d 388
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
when there is evidence before the trier of fact which upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the findings of the trier of the facts, the reviewing court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
- Humeniuk v. Union Carbide Corp. 416 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Minton v. Saint Bernard Parish School Board 416 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Brown v. Soupenne
416 So. 2d 170
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
but in those situations wherein a jury finding is based on an erroneous or incomplete jury charge, we are bound to set aside the judgment which implemented that jury verdict and determine the issues as a matter of first impression.
-
Grimaldi Plumbing & Heating Company, Inc. v. Doucette
414 So. 2d 832
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
[2] On appeal, we cannot conclude that the trial judge was either manifestly erroneous *834 or ascribed to an erroneous interpretation of law.
-
Roark v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
415 So. 2d 295
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
After a careful examination of the evidence in this case, (La.
- Colonial Bank v. Marina Seafood Market, Inc. 413 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Phillips v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR., ETC. 413 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Green v. City of Alexandria 413 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Williams v. Delcambre
413 So. 2d 324
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon'its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
- Delrie v. Transport Insurance 413 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Rozas v. La. Hospital Service, Inc.
413 So. 2d 364
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
-
Dowden v. Miller
415 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Canter v. Koehring *285 Company
- Tucker v. Howes 413 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Terrebonne v. SOUTH LOUISIANA TIDAL WATER CONTROL LEVEE DIST. 414 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Green v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 413 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Kramer v. Donovan 413 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
- Granger v. Ehlman 413 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Galjour v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
413 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
We acknowledge the trial court’s primacy, for which we cannot substitute, in fact finding and credibility evaluation, but we believe it was a legal error to reject as physically impossible the testimony of the witnesses that they did indeed see through the windows.
- BM Albrecht Elec., Inc. v. Griffin 413 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Pearce v. LJ Earnest, Inc. 411 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Chapman v. Belden Corp.
414 So. 2d 1283
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Roussel v. Colonial Sugars Co., supra
- Lee v. Hartford 411 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- James v. Vance 411 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Lavallais v. Dairyland Insurance
411 So. 2d 1227
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
as nearly as possible on the record”, on remand, (La.App.
-
Green v. Provencal Tie Mill
411 So. 2d 1228
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
We will not disturb reasonable evaluations of credibility and inferences of fact simply because another result might be just as reasonable, absent manifest error, Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
-
Dunn v. Redman Homes, Inc.
411 So. 2d 722
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
- Smith v. White 411 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Trahan v. CITY OF JENNINGS, ETC.
411 So. 2d 1242
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
- Bunkie Funeral Home, Inc. v. McNutt 414 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Higdon v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. 412 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Dollacker v. Schimek 411 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
-
Helis v. Business Capital Corp.
411 So. 2d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In instances such as this
- Alexander v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 411 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Succession of Negrotto 411 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Covington v. Department of Transportation & Development 411 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Schneider v. Proctor and Gamble Mfg. Co. 411 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Cisneros v. Ferro 411 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
-
Lucido v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co.
411 So. 2d 608
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Company, Inc., supra; Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., (La.