Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Jessie v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 398 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Hill v. Murco, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Gorbach v. Buck Kreihs Co. 398 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Therefore, this court is bound to affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Insurance Analysis, Inc. v. XPLO Corp. 398 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Stated another way, the reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.” (La.
Kent v. De La Cruz 400 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Stark v. Town of Merryville 396 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Williams v. Cinclare Central Factory 396 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Also see Canter v. Koehring Co., (SCT), , 724 IV [La.1973].
Neville v. Johnson 398 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Miller v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc. 398 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Heath v. Northgate Mall, Inc. 398 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Nash v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. 398 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
provides that the factual determinations of the trier of fact must not be disturbed unless a review of the trial record indicates that its conclusions are manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
American Motors Insurance Co. v. Leger 398 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
A court of appeal should not disturb the findings of the trial court when there is a conflict in the testimony unless it is clear they are “manifestly erroneous.”
Clement v. Marion Corp. 398 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Johnson v. Schwegmann Bros. 397 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Therefore, we are required to accept the factual finding of the trial court to the effect that plaintiff was detained by defendant's employees after all doubt was removed that he had in fact paid for the ice he was suspected of stealing.
Enclarde v. Roach 397 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ferguson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 398 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Canty v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury 397 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Mitchell v. Bertolla 397 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Standard Machine & Equipment Co. v. Lake Charles Refining Co. 396 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Randle v. Commercial Union Insurance 396 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact, which upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error....” “Manifest error”
Lyons v. Lyons 396 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Dickson v. State Farm Insurance Agency 396 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
“When there is evidence before the trier of facts which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.”
Helaire v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 397 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Guidry v. Houston General Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
West v. Belden Corp. 396 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Duncan v. Campbell Soup Co. 396 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Duplessis v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 396 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
McGee v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BD., ETC. 396 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Bozeman v. Fruin-Colnon Construction Co. 396 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bazley v. Tortorich 397 So. 2d 475 La. 1981
E. g., Berry v. Aetna Cas.
Smith v. Town of Logansport 395 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
This case presents a because there was a complete conflict between plaintiffs' expert witnesses and defendants' expert witnesses.
Succession of Richardson 392 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ewing and Salter, Inc. v. Gafner Automotive & MacHine Inc. 392 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
Ferro v. Green 394 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 394 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
commenting on the effect of contradictory testimony and the role of the appellate court in reviewing the factual determination of the trial court stated: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial c
Roberts v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 394 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Godwin v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 394 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Morris v. Hunter Chemical 394 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Moore v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 395 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
B & L Associates, (La.App.
Price v. Boquet 395 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Davis v. Louisiana Computing Corp. 394 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
1978, ; Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, .
Del B. Robinson Insurance Agency v. Bill Raney & Mel Wright Paint & Body Shop, Inc. 393 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In re the Succession of Reed 393 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Thornburg v. McMillin 392 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
Matter of Succession of Dunham 393 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Dosch v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 392 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Noel v. Devillier 392 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Moss v. Maryland Casualty Co. 392 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc. 392 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Anderson v. Moses 393 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980