Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. Haeuser 402 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[4] See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Estate of Schwegmann v. Schwegmann 402 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Thurman v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 402 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bernard v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 401 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
McGee v. Boulnois 401 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Thames v. Zerangue 401 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Benoit v. Phillips Iron Works, Inc. 401 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
” Our review of the record reveals that the trial court’s determination of facts is not manifestly erroneous and that the trial court was correct in concluding that the evidence overwhelmingly preponderated against the plaintiff.
Budd Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Alexandria 401 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Fontenot v. Estate of Vidrine 401 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Champagne v. Broussard 401 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Meeks v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 402 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra ; Hall v. Houston General Ins.
Clay v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 401 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Randazzo v. Randazzo 401 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Batiste v. Robillard 401 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the criteria for imposing executive officer liability, as follows: “1.
Wertz v. Estes 402 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Williams v. Homco International, Inc. 402 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. 399 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Burns v. Fernandez 401 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Wilson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 401 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Sanchez v. LeBlanc 400 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, La., ; Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Buchholz v. Dealers Transport Co. 399 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Succession of Dugas 400 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Weaver v. Otis Elevator Co. 399 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Haase v. Robicheaux 400 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Andersen v. Craig 401 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Lauro v. Lauro 399 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Carter v. Bergeron Plymouth-Chrysler, Inc. 400 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Watson v. West Bros. of Ville Platte, Inc. 399 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Trahan v. Broussard 399 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Comeaux v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Juneau v. Garan, Inc. 399 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Melancon v. Durand 399 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Majors v. Blue Cross of Louisiana 399 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the factual determinations of the trier of fact should not be disturbed unless clearly wrong.
Moreau v. Moreau 400 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Jofforion v. Leglue Buick, Inc. 399 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
Womack Bros., Inc. v. Equipment Rental Services, Inc. 399 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
McGinnis v. Grizzaffi 399 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Rahm v. Exxon Corp. 399 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Raley v. Carter 401 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Thibodeaux v. Southeastern Fire Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
SOUTHERN PLASTICS, ETC. v. Dixie Brewing Co. 399 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Hingle v. Plaquemines Oil Sales Corp. 399 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Morales v. Magnolia Chemicals & Solvents, Inc. 399 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Gallardo v. Department of Fire 399 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
page 724, appears appropriate here: "(8, 9) Where there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manif
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. v. Boyce Gin Co-Op., Inc. 397 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Provost v. A. E. Gravois & Sons, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The Supreme Court has restricted the intermediate appellate court’s ability to change a trial court’s finding of fact only to instances where the trial court’s finding of fact was “clearly wrong.”
Leach v. Freeman 395 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co. 400 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Mock v. Mock 400 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Harris v. Sewerage & Water Board 398 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981