Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Lewis v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 371 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[2] See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Reinhard v. City of New Orleans 371 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Riverland Oil Mill v. Underwriters for Lloyd's 368 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Givens v. Held 371 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
McMillan v. Travelers Ins. Co. 371 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Coleman v. Kroger Co. 371 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In reversing the jury's findings, we are mindful of the strong presumption in their favor ( ) but we also take note of the disfavor in which malicious prosecution actions have traditionally been held by the courts.
Seals v. Allstate Insurance 370 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Arceneaux v. Domingue 370 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Therein we stated, in pertinent part: “ our review of the record leads us to conclude that there is no manifest error or abuse of discretion on the part of the jury in holding for the defendants.
Clofort v. Matmoor, Inc. 370 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Talluto v. Patchen 370 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Toth v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. 370 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1979
In that case the court referred to its previous holding in the case of Canter v. Koehring, La., , 724: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.” The court went on to explain this to
Hebert v. Missouri PR Co. 366 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
we find no manifest error in the decision of the trial judge.
Kirk v. Allstate Ins. Co. 366 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
relative to an appellate court's review of findings of fact made at the trial level, is stated as follows: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court
Perez v. Continental Cas. Co. 367 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Freeman v. Bell 366 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
for holding Brewer liable for breaching a duty of care owed by him to plaintiff in his capacity as an employee of the club: 1.
Campbell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 369 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Porter v. Smith 368 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
deBlanc v. Mitchell 368 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
B & L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Crump 369 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Recently, in the case of Arceneaux v. Domingue, et al.
Circello v. Circello 369 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Guillotte v. Houston General Ins. Co. 368 So. 2d 1026 La. 1979
Although it recognized that reasonable inferences of fact drawn by a jury should not be disturbed upon review, see, the intermediate court overturned the jury's reasonable inference that Mrs. Guillotte did not fully know and appreciate the danger involved in stepping over the sixteen to twenty inch high light cord.
Davis v. Owen 368 So. 2d 1052 La. 1979
Couch v. Frichter's Sportsmen's Haven, Inc. 365 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Young v. Department of Hospitals 365 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Simmons v. State Dept. of Transp. 368 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Arceneaux v. Domingue, Bearb & Allstate Ins.
Farmer v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 368 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Kosay Enterprises, Inc. 368 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Trahan v. Ritterman 368 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Impola v. Martin 367 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Crump v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. 367 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
Hamilton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 364 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
LeBlanc v. American Emp. Ins. Co. 364 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Canter v. Koehring Co., et al.
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc. 366 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
American Ins. Co. v. Duo Fast Dixie, Inc. 367 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Hebert v. Maryland Cas. Co. 366 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Hankel v. Hartford Fire Insurance 366 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
Quality Transport, Inc. v. Younger Bros., Inc. 366 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
However, and the cases thereunder, command that the jury’s verdict should not be disturbed unless there is no reasonable evidentiary basis for the jury’s conclusions.
Arceneaux v. Adams 366 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Russell v. Windsor Properties, Inc. 366 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Rue v. Continental Insurance Co. 366 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Honeycutt v. Town of Boyce 366 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Bertrand v. Bourque 366 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Collier v. Foster 365 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Thrasher v. Leggett 365 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Arceneaux v. Domingue 365 So. 2d 1330 La. 1978
Clinkscales v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc. 365 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
[5] Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ; Muller v. A. K. Durnin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., La.App., .
Gegenheimer v. City of New Orleans 365 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Stevenson v. LeBlanc 365 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
We are unable to reverse a trier of fact’s determination of credibility; Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, .
Pounds v. Ecoff Trucking, Inc. 365 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Eckerd Drugs of Louisiana, Inc. v. Greenland Vistas, Inc. 365 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .