Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Daniels v. Albach Co., Inc. 365 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Fincher v. Surrette 365 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Cousin v. Page 367 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Plaisance v. Collins 365 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Greene v. Wright 365 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Co., Inc. 364 So. 2d 998 La. 1978
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc.
Marcelle v. Chin-Bing 364 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1978
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
First National Bank of Commerce v. Davis 365 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Fitch v. Evans 364 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
(at page 724) (La.1973) are determinative of this issue: *1312 "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence
Delaneuville v. Bullard 361 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
There is sufficient evidence to support such a finding, we cannot disturb such a finding absent manifest error.
Muller v. AK Durnin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. 361 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
White v. Edison 361 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
McKenzie v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. 363 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Hollis v. Travelers Ins. Co. 368 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Adamski v. Burdell 363 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Wolverton v. City Stores Co. 363 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Andry v. Kinberger 364 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
[2] See Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corp., La., ; Roussel v. Colonial Sugars Company, La., ; Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Southern Shipbuilding Corp. v. Richardson 363 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Harepour v. AC Collins Ford of New Orleans 363 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Bolden v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. 363 So. 2d 419 La. 1978
Canter v. Koehring, La., (1973).
Penneywell v. Clark-Dunbar, Inc. 363 So. 2d 905 La. 1978
However, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which states that “there is a reasonable evidentiary basis for this holding, and accordingly, it is affirmed” (La.
Borne v. Brumfield 363 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Graver v. Zeeman Enterprises, Inc. 362 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Gordon v. City of New Orleans 363 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Billiot v. Bourg, La., ; Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ; Robertson v. Palmer, La.App., .
Herbert v. Department of Police 362 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 362 So. 2d 568 La. 1978
In Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973), this Court held: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Karst v. Fryar 361 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Mitt v. Security Insurance Co. 361 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
We cannot substitute our evaluation of the evidence for that of the jury, Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, , and we therefore cannot say the jury’s verdict is not supported by the evidence.
Groth v. International Dispensing Systems 361 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Pitcher 361 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Canter v. Koehring Co., La., (1973).
Beck v. Lovell 361 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Under the circumstances, is inapplicable and this court must determine the issues as a matter of first impression.
Guin v. State Through Dept. of Highways 360 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Hernandez v. Comco Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc. 360 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Boyer v. Johnson 360 So. 2d 1164 La. 1978
23:1101 (prior to 1976 amendment)
Guillotte v. Houston General Insurance 360 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
by which a reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions drawn by the trier of fact.
Darensbourg v. Terranova 359 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Deroche v. Cuquet 359 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Bank of Louisiana v. Nash 360 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Jackson v. Watson 360 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
St. Pierre v. General Am. Transp. Corp. 360 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Ulmer v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 361 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Darbonne v. Allstate Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Bostick v. Intern. Minerals & Chemical Corp. 360 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
our Supreme Court refers to a cause of action similar to the one here asserted as one based upon an injury suffered by an employee due to the breach of the duty corporate officers owed to the employee.
Fowler v. Western Union Tel. Co. 357 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Rodriguez v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. 358 So. 2d 1237 La. 1978
LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co. 356 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Bordelon v. Sentry Insurance 359 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
The trial judge could therefore believe it and we cannot substitute our credibility evaluation for his; Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, .
Cobbs v. Veith 359 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978