Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Moore v. Travelers Insurance Co. 353 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Moss v. Security Nat. Ins. Co. 350 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Jacob v. Godchaux-Henderson Sugar Co., Inc. 350 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Barnes v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 350 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Though there is conflicting testimony about the condition of the surface of the bridge at the time of the accident, the above findings of the trial court are supported by a reasonable evidentiary basis and should not be disturbed on appeal
Samaniego v. Horseless Carriage, Inc. 350 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Carter v. Alexis 356 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
LeJeune v. Flash Truck Line, Inc. 353 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Abou-Hargah v. Miller Terrell, Inc. 356 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Gatheright v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 352 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Acme Poster Advertising Co. v. STATE, ETC. 352 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Plaintiff argues, however, that the evidence presented furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the default judgment appealed from, that judgment should be affirmed.
Loyden v. J. C. Penney Co. 352 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Fountain v. Anacoco Sand & Gravel, Inc. 352 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Sanders v. Hartford Life Ins. Co. 350 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Moreaux v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 350 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Spearman v. Barron 351 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cole v. Mott 351 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Whatley v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. 351 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Percle v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 349 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Lewis v. Pailet 349 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
In Cooley the Supreme Court analogized the cause of action to that of an employee against an executive officer of a
Gregorie v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 348 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Faulk v. Power Rig Drilling Co. 348 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Thornton v. Moran 348 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1st Cir. 1976), *81 wherein this Court after reviewing thoroughly the record in a bifurcated trial, [1] wherein opposite results were reached, and this Court being ever mindful of the manifest error rule and the "reasonable conclusion of fact" we concluded that neither result was manifestly erroneous and affirmed.
Cutrer v. Kentwood Motors, Inc. 351 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Babineaux v. LeBlanc 351 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Equipment Rental Services, Inc. v. Campesi 351 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Mack v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 351 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
McCastle v. Tri-G Marine Supplies Co. 351 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Jack Eckerd Corp. v. Collector of Revenue 351 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Nettles Excavators, Inc. v. Certain-Teed Products Corp. 351 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Bodin v. Dauphine 351 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Leon Naquin & Son, Inc. v. Clause 351 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
St. Pierre v. Gabel 351 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cable v. Cazayou 351 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Dugas v. St. Martin Parish Police Jury 351 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Co., La.App., (1973).
Higgins v. Johnson 349 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
We deem the clear import of Angelle, above, and Gonzales , above, to be that, in cases of this nature, (La.
Foss v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 351 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Alexander v. Burroughs Corporation 350 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Miller v. Young 350 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Brothers v. Null 350 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
James v. James 349 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Miller v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 349 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth criteria for imposing individual liability upon an officer, agent or employee of an employer to a third person, including a co-employee, damaged by reason of the individual's breach of an employment-imposed duty: "1.
Evans v. Gentry & Holder Floors, Inc. 349 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Folden v. Travelers Insurance Co. 349 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Henry v. City of Monroe 349 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
Dugas v. Broussard 348 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Soileau v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 348 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
dictates that we must give great weight to the district judge's fact conclusions, especially where credibility is concerned.
Helms v. Helms 349 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
This Court, in reviewing the factual and legal conclusions of the trial court, (La.
Orr v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 349 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Carter v. Poindexter 349 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
Cain v. Donald G. Lambert Contractors, Inc. 349 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
He did not maintain any proper lookout for his safety and he proceeded at too fast a rate of speed under the circumstances of the street repairs.” The trial court’s determination that the appellant was negligent is an inference of fact and as such we are guided in our review by the jurisprudence set forth in Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973) which stated: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual ba