Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Allen v. Toups 348 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
959 , , and the long line of cases which follows that -decision, including Canter v. Koehring Company, La., , and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., La., .
Johnson v. Romaguera 349 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
Owens v. New Orleans Bldg. Maintenance, Inc. 349 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Hullinghorst Industries, Inc. v. Kal-Die Casting Corp. 349 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Goff v. Occhipinti 349 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Jones v. Hankins 348 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Davidge v. Relan 348 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Graham v. Rudison 348 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Bunkie Bank & Trust Co. v. Avoyelles Parish Pol. 347 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
In its original decision in Thornton , the Court of Appeal held that although the jury and the judge reached opposite results, each result was supported by a
Maddox v. Southern Casualty Insurance 348 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Armentor v. Fred C. Benton Industrial Repairs 349 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
The trial judge found that Lewis
Wilson v. Millers Mutual Insurance 347 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Maddox v. Southern Casualty Insurance 348 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Quinney v. Maryland Casualty Co. 347 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Bohn Ford, Inc. v. Lanza 347 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, , instructs: When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation *938 of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
US Oil of Louisiana, Ltd. v. Power & Light Co. 350 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
The findings of the trial court are thus entitled to great weight and should not be disturbed where there is, as here, a reasonable basis for its findings
Meador v. International Paper Co. 348 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
These findings of the trial judge are based on a reasonable evaluation of the credibility of testimony and reasonable inferences of fact and, must be affirmed.
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc. 349 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
Icklone v. Travelers Indem. Co. 345 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Haydel v. Clark 347 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Harper v. Thompson 347 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Breaux v. Hartford Insurance Co. 347 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Williams v. Dupre 347 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Allen v. John F. Beasley Construction Co. 347 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
The criteria necessary for the imposition of liability in the so called “executive officer” ) as follows: “1.
Ortego v. Brouillette 347 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Florence v. Clinique Laboratories, Inc. 347 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Hingle v. DeBlieux Sales Agency 347 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Geissler v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 347 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cannon v. Baron, La.App., (1974), Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Mansfield v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 347 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Phillips v. Barraza 349 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Acosta v. Masters 348 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Sansonni v. Jefferson Parish School Bd. 344 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Parker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 348 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cox v. Southwestern Electric Power Co. 348 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Bice v. *1255 Southside Motors, Inc., (La.
Petite v. Richardson 347 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Geisler v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 346 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corp., supra
Succession of Ferrand 346 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Shavers v. Bright 346 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
We are not in a position to substitute our judgment for his; Canter v. Koehring, La.1973, .
Followed First National Bank of Jefferson Parish v. Louisiana Purchase Corp. 346 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Dedman v. Roussel 346 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
City Auto Wreckers, Inc. v. Wright 346 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Jennings v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY, IMCO 346 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. Williams 346 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Allemond v. Guidry 345 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
the Supreme Court set forth the guidelines for appellate review of factual conclusions by the trier of fact.
Cason v. Champagne 346 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
As set forth in Canter v. Koehring Co., La., : “.
Jones v. Francis Romero, Inc. 345 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Dowden v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Exnicios v. Miller 346 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Smith v. Quality Transport, Inc. 346 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977