DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blackwell, 298 So. 2d 798.

46 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Louie Von Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. English 243 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    1982) ; State v. Blackwell , (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry 221 So. 3d 815 La. 2017
    1979) (within trial court discretion whether to refuse argument involving penalties); (La.
  • State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Chatman 981 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Myers 839 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    App. 3 Cir. 7/17/96), , writ denied, 96-2121 (La.1/24/97), , this court explained: cert.
  • State v. Johnson 820 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    The supreme court held: (La.
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
  • State v. Cooper 678 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Dominick 658 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Byars 550 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Durocher 514 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Johnson 513 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Clark 466 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1st Cir.1983), modified on other grounds, certiorari denied, 420 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Nuccio 454 So. 2d 93 La. 1984
    decided the specific issue in this assignment, adversely to the defendant.
  • State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
  • State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    80 , (1963), (overruled on other grounds)
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Albert 430 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Napoli 428 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Dawson 392 So. 2d 445 La. 1980
  • State v. Simms 381 So. 2d 472 La. 1980
    80 , (1963), (overruled on other grounds)
  • State v. Martin 377 So. 2d 1200 La. 1979
    DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., and STONE, J. ad hoc
  • State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
    (on rehearing), we stated that our law did not require that the judge charge the jury on penalty.
  • State v. Bell 377 So. 2d 275 La. 1979
    an armed robbery prosecution, this Court held that a trial court had the discretion to refuse argument involving penalty.
  • Distinguished State v. Gurley 376 So. 2d 110 La. 1979
    *112 (La.1974), which held that a trial judge is not required to give instructions concerning lengths of possible sentences following guilty verdicts, stating: Instructions on the post-verdict status of a not guilty by reason of insanity acquittal are not properly analogous to instructions on post-conviction sentencin
  • State v. Washington 367 So. 2d 4 La. 1978
  • State v. Washington 367 So. 2d 4 La. 1978
    held that a jury need not be told of the penalty in an armed robbery case, noting, however, that in cases in which the penalty was mandatory life, the jury was to be informed of the sentence.
  • State v. Wrestle, Inc. 360 So. 2d 831 La. 1978
    art. 782's provision for non-unanimous verdicts of twelve-person juries does not offend equal protection or due process of the federal or state constitution ( or a defendant's right to be presumed innocent until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Gray 351 So. 2d 448 La. 1977
    and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Hodges 349 So. 2d 250 La. 1977
    In his concurrence, he stated that "in any case tried after the finality of the present decision I shall regard the bench and bar as on notice that, in the view of a majority of this court, a charge and argument may be required and permitted, despite Blackwell [ State v. Blackwell, La., ], when the statutory offense requires a mandatory legislative penalty, with no judicial discretion as to its imposition following verdict.
  • State v. Brent 347 So. 2d 1112 La. 1977
  • State v. Milby 345 So. 2d 18 La. 1977
  • State v. Unzueta 337 So. 2d 1102 La. 1976
    held that in those jurisdictions where the jury determines only guilt or innocence and the court imposes the penalty, as is the case in Louisiana, it is not error for the court to refuse to instruct the jury on possible penalties.
  • State v. Chatman 337 So. 2d 1106 La. 1976
  • State v. Prater 337 So. 2d 1107 La. 1976
    State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Roberts 331 So. 2d 11 La. 1976
  • State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
    A majority of this court has held that the trial court is not required to charge the jury as to the sentence-effects of verdicts, nor as to the consequences of an acquittal on the ground of insanity, (decided February 24, 1975).
  • State v. Beckert 326 So. 2d 494 La. 1976
  • State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
  • State v. Madison 319 So. 2d 912 La. 1975
    State v. Hill, La., (1974); State v. Lewis, La., (1974); State v. Blackwell, La., (1973); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Ross 320 So. 2d 177 La. 1975
    we held that less than unanimous verdicts are not constitutionally infirm and do not offend the Equal Protection or Due Process requirements of the State or Federal Constitutions.
  • State v. George 312 So. 2d 860 La. 1975
    we held that it was not error for a trial court to refuse to charge the jury as to the penalty applicable to the charged crime (armed robbery in that instance).
  • State v. Sylvester 298 So. 2d 807 La. 1974
    Nor does our present majority attempt to consider the effect of the present holding on the correctness of our first or ultimate decision in State v. Blackwell, La., (Docket No. 53,405, decided March 29, 1974; rehearing granted, and now submitted after argument on rehearing).
  • State v. Lewis 296 So. 2d 824 La. 1974
    See the opinion on first hearing, and the dissent on rehearing, on our docket, and the dissent in State v. Harris, 258 La.