DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Paciera, 290 So. 2d 681.

138 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Anthony Joseph Chaney La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Will Antonio Celestine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    See also State v. Wright, []; -88 (La.1974).
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Wayne Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Quang T. Do 130 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “The repeal, re-enactment, or amendment of a penal statute does not extinguish or alter the liability for penalty of the former statute, unless the legislature so intends....” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. James Oliver McKeehan, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    We acknowledge Louisiana’s prior case law on the subject has adhered to the rule that “the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged offense and prior to conviction did not deny defendant d
  • State v. Dick 951 So. 2d 124 La. 2007
    see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under *135 a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged offense and prior to conviction did not deny defendant due process or equal protection when the amendat
  • State v. Pulliam 920 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged offense and prior to conviction did not deny defendant due process or equal protection when the amendatory
  • State of Louisiana v. David James Pulliam La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    We acknowledge Louisiana’s prior case law on the subject has adhered to the rule that “the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged offense and prior to conviction did not deny defendant d
  • State v. Parker 871 So. 2d 317 La. 2004
    at 391 , 17 So.2d at 560 ; see also, accord
  • State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02)
  • State v. Harris 839 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Warren 824 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    ressly so provides, and such law shall be treated as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture or liability.” |7“The repeal, re-enactment, or amendment of a penal statute does not extinguish or alter the liability for penalty of the former statute, unless the legislature so intends ...”
  • State v. Mayeux 820 So. 2d 526 La. 2002
    see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged offense and prior to conviction did not deny defendant due process or equal protection when the amendatory
  • State v. Flagg 815 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See also State v. Wright, supra; -88 (La.1974).
  • State v. Blanchard 749 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    "The credibility of an anonymous informant can be supported by `any specific independent corroboration of the accuracy of the instant report.'" (1980), (1974).
  • State v. Perret 628 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Dennis 540 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    State v. Paciera, supra [ (1974) ]; "
  • State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Stout 470 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that specific independent corroboration of the accuracy of a report by an unidentified informant supports the credibility and reliability of the unidentified informant.
  • State v. Stewart 465 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Defendant contends that the affidavit, pursuant to which the search warrant was issued
  • State v. Davis 461 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that specific independent corroboration of the accuracy of a report by an unidentified informant supports the credibility and reliability of the unidentified informant.
  • State v. Rodriguez 458 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wood 457 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Stewart 451 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bearden 449 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) and held that facts must establish the informant's credibility and the reliability of the information supplied.
  • State v. Manso 449 So. 2d 480 La. 1984
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bradley 446 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Tate 444 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964)
  • State v. Sterling 444 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Dunn 442 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)
  • State v. Ditcharo 441 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    -86 (La.1974) which held: “The affidavit súbmitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information given by h
  • State v. Stroud 438 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) [5]
  • State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ruffin 434 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Buckley, 426 So.2d at 107
  • State v. Martinez 432 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. St. Hill 433 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Mann 431 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Zamora 430 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    -686 (La.1974), wherein it is stated: “ * * * The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the inf
  • State v. Johnson 429 So. 2d 870 La. 1983
  • State v. Tesch 431 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court, in applying the Aguilar standard, stated the following: “If we can deduce a rule from these cases, it is this: The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a
  • State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
  • State v. Rayes 424 So. 2d 260 La. 1982
    725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)
  • State v. Paquette 423 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    required an affidavit based on hearsay to “set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information given by him.” where reference
  • State v. Roubique 421 So. 2d 859 La. 1982
    this court stated: If we can deduce a rule from these cases, it is this: The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find
  • State v. Huffman 419 So. 2d 458 La. 1982
  • State v. Dillon 419 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    The trial judge, in her reasons for judgment, found the affidavit inadequate to establish probable cause to search the Dillon residence, (La.