Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bray, 292 So. 2d 697.

15 citing documents.

State v. Robinson 634 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
La.Code of Evidence art. 403.
State v. King 478 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
the original charge of murder was read to the jury and then this charge was orally amended in the presence of the jury to manslaughter.
State v. Dixon 457 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Defendant argues that because the victim had already made an in-court identification, any probative value of the “regular” lineup display was outweighed by its prejudicial effect, citing Rule 403
State v. LeJeune 352 So. 2d 619 La. 1977
State v. Callihan, La., (1975); State v. Monroe, La., (1974); State v. Bray, La., (1974); State v. Skiffer, 253 La.
State v. Rheams 352 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
is somewhat analogous to the situation here.
State v. Monroe 345 So. 2d 1185 La. 1977
State v. Nicolaus 340 So. 2d 296 La. 1976
Cf. Federal Rule of Evidence 703 (1975)
State v. Scott 337 So. 2d 1087 La. 1976
786 , 42 L.Ed.2d 808 (1975)
State v. Johnson 327 So. 2d 388 La. 1976
State v. Ned 326 So. 2d 477 La. 1976
State v. Skiffer, 253 La.
State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 819 La. 1976
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
State ex rel. Bray v. Henderson 323 So. 2d 128 La. 1975
From the opinion of this Court ( ) it *129 clearly appears that there was “some” evidence of the cause of death.
State v. Callihan 320 So. 2d 155 La. 1975
State v. Skiffer, 253 La.
State v. Jones 320 So. 2d 182 La. 1975
Cf. Federal Rule of Evidence 703 (1975)