Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rey v. Cuccia, 298 So. 2d 840.

185 citing documents.

Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Oil Country Tubular Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Justiss Oil Co. v. Oil Country Tubular Corp. 216 So. 3d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
1981) (on rehearing); (La.
Blair v. Bad Boy Inc. 137 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Guillot v. Doughty 142 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(statutorily overruled on other grounds 8 ), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the burden of proof in a redhibition action as follows: A redhibitory defect entitling the buyer to annul the sale is some defect in the manufacture or design of a thing sold ‘which renders it either absolutely useless, or its
Huey D. Bonnette, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Bonnette v. Ford Motor Co. 88 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Nolan v. Mabray 51 So. 3d 665 La. 2010
See Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), -42 ; (proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when taking the evidence as a whole).
Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hebert v. Brazzel, 403 So.2d *1005 1242 (La.1981); Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Mitchell R. Credeur, Et Ux. v. Champion Homes of Boaz, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Credeur v. Champion Homes of Boaz, Inc. 6 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC 984 So. 2d 685 La. 2008
Prince v. Paretti Pontiac Co., Inc.
Cook v. Stowe 914 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
(c) Under this Article, concluding that redhibition is available even though the thing sold is in itself free of defects, are legislatively overruled.
Gradney v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc. 900 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
(emphasis added), wherein the court stated: "When the sale is annulled for a redhibitory defect resulting from the original manufacture, the purchaser can recover the pecuniary loss resulting from the unusable thing sold from the manufacturer as well as the seller."
John E. Gradney, Jr. v. Chandelier Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
(emphasis added), wherein the court stated: “When the sale is annulled for a redhibitory defect resulting from the original manufacture, the purchaser can recover the pecuniary loss resulting from the unusable thing sold from the manufacturer as well as the seller.” In Rey, a camper trailer su
Ollis v. Miller 886 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
McGough v. Oakwood Mobile Homes, 34,091 (La.App.2d Cir.11/01/00), .
Bearly v. Brunswick Mercury Marine Div. 888 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
See, Austin's of Monroe, (La.App.
Mike Legros v. Arc Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
473 (1973), the buyer's action for breach of implied warranty has been extended to all sellers in the chain of sales back to the primary manufacturer; see Rey v. Cuccia, La., (1974); Clark v. McBride Dodge, Inc., Breaux v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., 282 So .2d 763 (La.App.1st Cir. 1973); Barham: Redhibition; A Comparative Comment, 49 Tul.L.Rev.
LeGros v. ARC Services, Inc. 867 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
473 (1973), the buyer's action for breach of implied warranty has been extended to all sellers in the chain of sales back to the primary manufacturer; see Rey v. Cuccia, La., (1974); Clark v. McBride Dodge, Inc., 298[289] So.2d 841 (La.App.4th Cir. 1973); Breaux v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Bruce A. Baker v. Mazda Motor of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the burden of proof in a as follows: The buyer may prove the existence of redhibitory defects at the time of the sale not only by direct evidence of eyewitnesses, but also by circumstantial evidence giving rise to the reasonable inference that the defect existed at
Baker v. Mazda Motor of America 856 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the burden of proof in a as follows: The buyer may prove the existence of redhibitory defects at the time of the sale not only by direct evidence of eyewitnesses, but also by circumstantial evidence giving rise to the reasonable inference that the defect existed at the time of the sale.
Dailey v. the Home Furnishings Store 857 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Chastant v. Oasys Imaging, Inc. 839 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the burden of proof in a : The buyer may prove the existence of redhibitory defects at the time of the sale not only by direct evidence of eyewitnesses, but also by circumstantial evidence giving rise to the reasonable inference that the defect existed at the time of the sale.
Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. 837 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir.1992), writ denied, and Branch v. Chevron International Oil Co., Inc., 681 F.2d 426 (5th Cir.1982).
Pratt v. Himel Marine, Inc. 823 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
McGough v. Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. 779 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
McMorris v. Marcotte Builders, L.L.C., supra , citing Landaiche v. Supreme Chevrolet, Inc., (La.
Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 756 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
(on rehearing); Hostetler v. W. Gray & Co., Inc., supra .
McNeely v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 763 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir.1992), writ denied, and Branch v. Chevron International Oil Co., Inc., 681 F.2d 426 (5th Cir.1982).
Ross v. Premier Imports 704 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hob's Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Landaiche v. Supreme Chevrolet, Inc., (La.App.
Jackson v. Slidell Nissan 693 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Trahan v. Savage Industries, Inc. 692 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Louisiana *499 Tort Law (1996).
Fruge v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. 692 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
expanded the three day inference stating that if the defect appears “soon after the thing is put into use, a reasonable inference may arise, in the absence of other explanation or intervening cause shown, that the defect existed at the time of the sale.” (citations omitted.)
Grimaldi v. JP & Sons Contractors 686 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
Mallery v. International Harvester Co. 690 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Dupree-Simpson Farms v. HELENA CHEMICAL 682 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
(on rehearing); Hostetler v. W. Gray & Co., Inc., supra .
Dixie Roofing v. Allen Parish Sch. Bd. 690 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Bo-Pic Foods, Inc. v. POLYFLEX FILM AND CONVERTING 665 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hob's Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, J.B.
Smith v. Arcadian Corp. 657 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
253, 57 (W.D.La.1978); Sec.
LeBlanc v. Mercedes-Benz of North America 633 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Poche v. Bayliner Marine Corp. 632 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
Colchoneria Jiron v. Blumenthal Print Works 629 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Roddy v. Crawford 618 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Arnold v. Wray Ford, Inc. 606 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
art. 2531; ] or he can sue for a reduction of the purchase price.
Landaiche v. Supreme Chevrolet, Inc. 602 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
2522 and 2474; Hob's Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Inc.
Anthony's Auto Sales, Inc. v. Shephard 600 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 595 So. 2d 1123 La. 1992