DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., 299 So. 2d 347.

54 citing documents.

  • S & S Coating Specialties v. Brock Dore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., (La.
  • S & S COATING SPECIALTIES v. Dore 971 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Crickett Miller v. Blacktype Farms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., (La.
  • Miller v. Blacktype Farms 952 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., see also La.
  • Thomas v. Town of Arnaudville 713 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    ur supreme court reiterated the appropriate standard for a claimant in a workers’ compensation suit: In a workman’s compensation, suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence-i.e., “the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not], the employment accident caused the disability.” Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood, Co., Inc.
  • Bruno v. Harbert International Inc. 580 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Louisiana Supreme Court set forth general principles in this regard in West, supra, The Court said: [1] In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i.e., “the testimony as a whole must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.” Gradfey v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Clouatre v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 557 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
  • Laird v. Payne & Keller, Inc. 491 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    “See: Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Bruce v. Pat's Restaurant of Cameron, Inc. 477 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Company, Inc.
  • Guillot v. Sentry Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    "See: Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Wise v. La. Dept. of Transp. & Development 470 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Cf. Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Company, Inc.
  • Matthews v. Allied Chemical Corp. 454 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., Flood, supra
  • Schwendinger v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 451 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    “[1] In a workmen’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i.e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] .the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., *57 349 (La.1974).
  • Devillier v. N.L. Industries, Inc. 445 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2d 262 (La.1977); Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Karam v. Ashworth 445 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    ablish a work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i.e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than (not) the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Martin v. Emerson Elec. Co. 437 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Co. of North America, Gradney v. Vancouvr Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Pennington v. Reading & Bates Construction Co. 432 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Martin v. Pala, Inc. 439 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Oalmann v. Brock and Blevins Co., Inc. 428 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Hebert v. Lake Charles American Press 427 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Flood v. Hub Auto Parts, Inc. 425 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Company, Inc., Thompson v. Natchitoches, supra.
  • Martin v. HB Zachry Co. 424 So. 2d 1002 La. 1982
  • Vallot v. Andrus Homes, Inc. 425 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    set forth in the case of West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: “In a workmen’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence, i.e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Wyman v. West Jefferson General Hospital 416 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Blount v. Cooper Stevedoring Co., Inc. 416 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Breaux v. Allstate Insurance 411 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    ish the work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: “In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i.e., “the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.” Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Martin v. H. B. Zachry Co. 411 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    ” In the Lindsey case, the court reversed the appellate court and the trial court and remanded the case to the trial court after it determined that the plaintiff had met his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his disabling co
  • Gremillion v. Babst Services, Inc. 405 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    ” In that case, moreover, the court also said at 1092-1093: “As noted above, if a plaintiff in good health continually suffers from a disabling condition after an accident, and there is a reasonable possibility that the accident caused the conditio
  • Hickman v. Miller 405 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc.
  • Jones v. Liberty Mutual Ins. 402 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    “See: Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 401 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Benoit v. Phillips Iron Works, Inc. 401 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    See: Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Juneau v. Garan, Inc. 399 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    lish a work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: “In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i. e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Graham v. Jones Bros. Co. 393 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Co. of North America, Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Lindsey v. HA Lott, Inc. 387 So. 2d 1091 La. 1980
  • Charleston v. Nabors Trailers, Inc. 381 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., (La.
  • Rowland v. Continental Oil Co., Inc. 374 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co. Inc., La., (1974); Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co., La., (1973); Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., supra.
  • West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc. 371 So. 2d 1146 La. 1979
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • State Ex Rel. Guste v. Two O'Clock Bayou Land 365 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Crump v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. 367 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
    See: Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., *302 (La.1977); Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Suire v. Primeaux 363 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Company, Inc.
  • Lonzo v. Holsum Bakeries, Inc. 363 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., St.
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McInnis 360 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    We have doubts that these appellate court decisions are correct because of the languagé of the Louisiana Supreme Court in the case of Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Haughton v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Companies 355 So. 2d 927 La. 1978
  • Cahanin v. Lafayette General Hospital 352 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Griffin v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 345 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co. Inc., La., (1974); Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co., La., (1973); Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., supra.” decided the same day as LeLeux, above, stated the following on the question of causal relation between an employee’s work and a heart attac
  • Johnson v. Ascension Parish School Board 342 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America 342 So. 2d 591 La. 1977
    sulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows there to be a reasonable possibility of causal connection between the accident and the disabling condition, Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
  • Thompson v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp. Serv. Dist. 335 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Company, Inc.
  • Williams v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 327 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Company, Inc., Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Company, supra.