DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brewer, 301 So. 2d 630.

24 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Calvin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    the supreme court stated the following: In his Per curiam attached to these bills the judge states that he was acting pursuant to the powers granted him under C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Lewis 511 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Meredith 400 So. 2d 580 La. 1981
    State v. Williams, 262 La.
  • State v. McPhate 393 So. 2d 718 La. 1981
    See e. g., ; ; ; in which this Court found no abuse of discretion when the trial court denied the motions for continuance when there were three months, thirty-five working days, ninety days and three weeks respectively for counsel to prepare for trial and where there was no showing of specific prejudice."
  • State v. Rogers 375 So. 2d 1304 La. 1979
  • State v. Durio 371 So. 2d 1158 La. 1979
    See e. g., in which this Court found no abuse of discretion when the trial court denied the motions for continuance when there were three months, thirty-five working days, ninety days and three weeks respectively for counsel to prepare for trial and where there was no showing of specific prejudice.
  • State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
  • State v. Dominick 354 So. 2d 1316 La. 1978
  • State v. MacKie 352 So. 2d 1297 La. 1977
    State v. Winston, La., (1976); State v. Carruth, La., (1975); State v. Brewer, La., (1974); State v. Williams, 262 La.
  • State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
  • State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
  • State v. Karno 342 So. 2d 219 La. 1977
    State v. Williams, 262 La.
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 208 La. 1976
    State v. Tennant, 262 La.
  • State v. Jones 332 So. 2d 466 La. 1976
    1057 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970); State v. Boudoin, 257 La.
  • State Ex Rel. Miller v. Henderson 329 So. 2d 707 La. 1976
  • State v. Winston 327 So. 2d 380 La. 1976
    While the general rule that a trial judge has a large measure of discretion in determining whether or not a continuance will be granted is recognized and respected by this Court, [ State v. Williams, 262 La.
  • State v. Wilkerson 326 So. 2d 353 La. 1976
  • State v. Taylor 324 So. 2d 425 La. 1975
  • State v. Washington 322 So. 2d 185 La. 1975
    1057 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970)
  • State v. Brown 322 So. 2d 211 La. 1975
  • State v. Washington 322 So. 2d 185 La. 1975
    1057 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970)
  • State v. Smith 322 So. 2d 197 La. 1975
    1057 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970), ordinarily reversible error may be committed, as the denial of a fair trial, if an accused is tried clothed in prison garb or shackled or otherwise exhibited to the trial jury under circumstances which tend to deprive him of his presumption of his innocence.
  • State v. Burkhalter 319 So. 2d 392 La. 1975
    State v. Brewer, La., (1974) (syllabus 9).
  • State v. Rowell 306 So. 2d 671 La. 1975