DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., 304 So. 2d 351.

148 citing documents.

  • Lognion v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 503 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ (La.
  • Lacour v. Travelers Ins. Co. 502 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ (La.
  • Cummings v. Wafer 499 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Distinguished Masters v. Village of Florien 495 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In any event, an abuse of trial-court discretion must be clearly demonstrated by the record before an appellate court will tamper with an award of general damages.” Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Simon v. Hooker Chemical Corp. 489 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., cited in the Coco decision, the Supreme Court declared: “The awards made in other cases provide no scale of uniformity; their use is limited to serving as an aid to determine, if the present award is greatly disproportionate to similar awards (if truly similar), whether an issue of abuse of discretion may e
  • Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ], supra; Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Rawls v. Morris 470 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Champagne v. Lee 470 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    General damages are defined in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as: "those which may not be fixed with any degree of pecuniary exactitude but which, instead, involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of gratification of intellectual or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-style which cannot really be measured definitively in ter
  • Dubois v. State Through Dept. of Pub. Safety 466 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 456 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Boswell v. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. 454 So. 2d 1081 La. 1984
    Co., supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Schweiger v. Sanders 449 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Labatory, Inc., [ ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Lauer v. City of Kenner 445 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • Dawson v. James H. Stuart and Deaton, Inc. 437 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    General damages are defined in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as "...
  • Hart v. Allstate Ins. Co. 437 So. 2d 823 La. 1983
  • Spears v. Aguilar 436 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ (La.
  • Larson v. Huskey 440 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [ (La.
  • Wilkinson v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 434 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Smith v. Jones 432 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Ducoing v. Carter 427 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Martinez v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 423 So. 2d 1088 La. 1982
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Lab, Inc., (La.
  • Alexander v. Leger 423 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [ ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • London v. Bell 422 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Monnier v. Boutte 420 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ], supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Guidry v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 416 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., (1974); Covington v. Department of Transp., Etc., (La.App.
  • Faulk v. Cagle Supply, Inc. 412 So. 2d 1020 La. 1982
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [La., ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [La., ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., [La., ] supra, Walker v. Champion, [La., ] supra.
  • Lawrence v. Grant Parish School Bd. 409 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ], supra; Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Walton v. William Wolf Baking Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 168 La. 1981
    See Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra, [ ]; Bitoun v. Landry, supra, [ ]; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Simon v. Commercial Union Insurance 402 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    “General damages” are defined in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as “...
  • Batiste v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 401 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra [ ]; Bitoun v. Landry, supra [ ]; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Placide v. Jay 378 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ” our Supreme Court states: In the event the appellate court finds from the record an abuse of discretion, the award may be disturbed by lowering it to the highest point which is reasonably within the d
  • Ebarb v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 376 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Cacibauda v. Gaiennie, 305 So2nd 572 [La.App.]; Douglas Fowler, et al v. Western Union Telegraph Company, et al, 359 So2nd 196 [La.].” As regards general damages, the rule of appellate review is stated in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: “The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Huval v. Sinitiere 376 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co. 369 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., (La.
  • Dupree v. Pechinay Saint Gobain Co. 369 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    The Supreme Court has also set forth the rule of appellate review as it applies to awards of general damages in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: "The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Case v. Arrow Trucking Co. 372 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Ehrhardt v. Cummins 369 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., , supra; , supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Meadoux v. Hall 369 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Clofort v. Matmoor, Inc. 370 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    See Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra
  • Talluto v. Patchen 370 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Wilson v. Magee 367 So. 2d 314 La. 1979
    Carollo v. Wilson, supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Lanclos v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 366 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    959 , (1967); and restated in a number of cases since, including these: Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc. 363 So. 2d 506 La. 1978
    In Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., (1974), we set forth the applicable principles as follows: "The trier of fact is granted much discretion in the award of general damages, i. e., those which may not be fixed with any degree of pecuniary exactitude but which, instead, involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of gratificatio
  • Watson v. Bechtel 360 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    There is no measurable loss of visual function at this time but the eyelid pigmentation appears to be permanent.” The trial court is vested with much discretion in determining quantum, Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., and we do not find the award of $2,250 to be excessive.
  • Mouton v. Godchaux's Inc. 360 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    In that case the court reiterated its previous pronouncement in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., in which the court had said that the appellate court might consider awards in similar cases to serve as an aid to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in the case under review.
  • Ulmer v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 361 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    The Supreme Court has also set forth the rule of appellate review as it applies to awards of general damages in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: "The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Fowler v. Western Union Tel. Co. 357 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    285 , (1971); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Smith v. Government Employees Insurance 358 So. 2d 1289 La. 1978
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [La., (1974)]; Bitoun v. Landry, [La., (1974)]; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Danos v. Foret 354 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Our holding is consistent with the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., and the other cases cited by the appellant.