DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., 304 So. 2d 351.

148 citing documents.

  • St. Martin v. Maryland Casualty Co. 357 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Civil Code Article 1934(3) .” Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Robichaux v. Cade 357 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Anderson v. Welding, Testing Laboratory, Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Baumgartner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 356 So. 2d 400 La. 1978
  • Carollo v. Wilson 353 So. 2d 249 La. 1977
  • Billeaud v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 349 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    959 , (1967); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Billeaud v. UNITED STATE FIDELITY & GUAR. CO. 349 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    959 , (1967); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Carville v. Travelers Insurance Co. 348 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., in addressing the subject, the Court, said: “The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Wagner v. Hazelquist 347 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    We would have thought that Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., and now Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., had permanently disabused any appealing parties of the idea that “similar” injuries necessitates “similar” awards.
  • Lindsay v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. 347 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Furthermore, it is impossible for an appellate court to judge *1287 what evidence in a particular case was given special weight by the finder of fact.” The Supreme Court also set forth the rule of appellate review as it applies to awards of general damages in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: “The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Johnson v. International Ins. Co. 347 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Gaudet v. Allstate Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Co., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Schexnayder v. Carpenter 346 So. 2d 196 La. 1977
    Plaintiffs contend that the court of appeal reduced the award for damages to Mrs. Schexnayder in violation of Louisiana Civil Code article 1934(3) and the principles announced in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Straley v. Calongne Drayage and Storage, Inc. 346 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
    art. 1934(3); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Vidrine v. Sentry Indem. Co. 341 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    See Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., and cases cited therein.
  • Hutchinson v. Woolworth 345 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., (La.App.
  • Jinks v. McClure 344 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Adams v. Travelers Insurance Co. 343 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    2 Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Price v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 342 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Grasso v. Hebert 342 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
  • Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies 339 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    art. 1934(3); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., (La.App.
  • Frank v. Pitre 341 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 341 So. 2d 332 La. 1977
    959 , (1967); and restated in a number of cases since, including these: Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Distefano v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 340 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    GENERAL DAMAGE AWARD The rule of appellate review as it applies to awards of general damages was rather recently set forth in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: “The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Panek v. Gulf Ins. Co. 341 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    The rule of appellate review as it applies to awards of general damages was rather recently set forth in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: "The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Howard v. Acosta 340 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    See Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., (La.
  • Givens v. T & M Fertilizer Co. 340 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    In the recent case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., our Supreme Court reiterated the rule that appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court has abused its great discretion in such instances.
  • Temple v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 336 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Fox v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, La., ; Walker v. Champion, La., ; Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., .
  • Heckel v. Travelers Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., (1974).
  • Lester v. EMPLOYERS MUT. LIABILITY INS. CO. 333 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Aymond v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 333 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    The rule of appellate review as it applies to awards of general damages was rather recently set forth in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., as follows: "The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Ardoin v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 333 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    959 , Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Averett v. Alexander 336 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., (1974).
  • Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 330 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    In the more recent case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., (1974) the rule of appellate review is stated as follows: "The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion.
  • Larriviere v. Roy Young, Inc. 333 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Fontenot v. Guillory 327 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Overturf v. Bernard 331 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    In this regard we note the following language in Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., : “* * * The awards made in other cases provide no scale of uniformity; their use is limited to serving as an aid to determine, if the present award is greatly disproportionate to similar awards (if truly similar), whether an issue of abuse of discretion may exist in the present case.
  • Levy v. Duclaux 324 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    See Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Raggio v. Volkswagen Insurance Co. 327 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Sticker v. General Foods Corp. 324 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    It appears that the award is for general damages and the trier of fact is granted much discretion in such awards; Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratiory, Inc., La., (1974).
  • Ogaard v. Wiley 325 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Scott v. Robinson 322 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    See Anderson v. Welding and Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Burrows v. Louisiana State Department of Highways 319 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    959 , (1967); Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Green v. State, Southwest Louisiana Charity Hosp. 309 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., and cases cited therein.
  • Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 308 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • LeBlanc v. Roy Young, Inc. 308 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Henry W. Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., (1974) (La.
  • Guidry v. Canal Insurance Co. 313 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The Supreme Court of Louisiana has discussed the award of general damages very recently in the case of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., (1974) from which we quote: “The trier of fact is granted much discretion in the award of general damages, i. e., those which may not be fixed with any degree of pecuniary exactitude but which, instead, involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of gratification of intellectual or physical e
  • Scott v. Sylvester 318 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    In assessing an award herein where the trial court gave none, we are mindful of the teachings of Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., in which the Supreme Court made clear the proper limitations on appellate review of damages.
  • Foreman v. Delahoussaye 309 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.