Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So. 2d 93.

227 citing documents.

Reed v. City of Ville Platte 619 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Enerland Recovery Services, Inc. v. Parish of Lafourche 619 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Charia v. Hulse 619 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Kuebler, supra; Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Holmes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 587 * (La.App.
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 618 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. 616 So. 2d 1234 La. 1993
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Massey v. G.B. Cooley Hospital for Retarded Citizens 593 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana v. Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Holmes v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA 587 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Scariano Brothers, (La.App.
King v. Western Club, Inc. 587 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil 576 So. 2d 475 La. 1991
See Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Morris v. People's Bank & Trust Co. 580 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
[2] PEOPLE'S BANK The Louisiana Supreme Court in Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., explained the purpose and function of an exception of no cause of action: The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition.
Tuttle v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 579 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
5th Cir.1987), writ denied, which is intended to test the legal sufficiency of the petition, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Kuebler v. Martin 578 So. 2d 113 La. 1991
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Welcker v. Fair Grounds Corp. 577 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The trial judge found that the track lights distorted the historic, original color of the Luling Mansion at night and that this distortion constituted “real damage” compensable under article 667 of the Louisiana Civil Code, citing Hero Lands v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Petrocana, Inc. v. MARGO INC. 577 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Jarrell v. Carter 577 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Wilkinson v. LaFranz 574 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Pines v. Dr. Carlos D. Moreno, Inc. 569 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
citing Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Harrington v. Southwestern Elec. Power Co. 567 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
1984), reconsideration denied, Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Kok v. Harris 563 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Pittman v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp. 559 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Piro v. Stan Weber & Associates, Inc. 556 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Pro., art. 927, the plaintiffs petition must be given every reasonable interpretation which might sustain its adequacy, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Brumfield v. Miller 554 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See also Rodriguez v. American Bankers Insurance Comp *831 ny of Florida, Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Neal v. Superior Enterprises, Inc. 552 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
State v. MAYOR AND BD. OF ALDERMEN OF CITY OF TALLULAH 549 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Klumpp v. XYZ Ins. Co. 547 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
LP v. Oubre 547 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Ricard v. State 544 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Tallo v. Stroh Brewery Co. 544 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., at 96.
Honeywell, Inc. v. Sierra 543 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Frank v. St. Landry Parish School Board 540 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Art. 927(4), 931; Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Guillory v. Nicklos Oil & Gas Co., (La.App.
Sears v. Fontaine 539 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Art. 931; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Latter & Blum, Inc. v. A. J. Warehouse, Inc., (La.App.
Fidelity Bank and Trust Co. v. Hammons 540 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Gotreaux v. Gary, 232 La.
Johnfroe v. Children's Hosp. 537 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Street v. Equitable Petroleum Corp. 532 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc
Cooley v. State 533 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 530 So. 2d 1151 La. 1988
art. 931 (West 1984); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Cost v. St. Landry Parish School Bd. 528 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Cupp v. Federated Rural Electric Ins.
Tortorich v. Neese Enterprises, Inc. 528 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Butler v. Baber 529 So. 2d 374 La. 1988
Gorman v. Swaggart 524 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Day v. Warren 524 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
we recognized that the prohibitions contained in C.C.
Broussard v. Guidry 517 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Lagarde v. Allstate Ins. Co. 515 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Richards v. LaCour 515 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Also, F. Stone, Louisiana Tort Doctrine, § 229 (1977); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Langlois v. Allies Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Stewart v. City of Pineville 511 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
*28 “In Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., the Court stated: ‘Recently in Hillard v. Shuff, 260 La.
Dickens v. Auvil 508 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Incorporated, Lewis v. Willamette Industries, Incorporated, (La.App.
Curtis v. GMAC Leasing Corp. 506 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 927(4); Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Lewis v. Willamette Industries, Inc. 499 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Dixie Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre 498 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Robinson, supra; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Clingan v. Doughty 491 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., the Supreme Court stated as follows: “The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition.