Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., 310 So. 2d 93.

227 citing documents.

C. Frank Holthaus v. Cameron Brown Co. 491 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
As we must liberally construe the petition to grant a cause of action under any theory supported by its facts, Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., we conclude that plaintiff has pled a cause of action for damages under the “ ‘broad ambit of protection’ ” of Articles 2315 and 2316.
First Pontchartrain Savings Ass'n v. Evangeline Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 487 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
[3] ] *98 In Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., we presented the following analysis of the exception of no cause of action: The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition.
Broussard v. Northcott Exploration Co., Inc. 481 So. 2d 125 La. 1986
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Gotreaux v. Gary, 232 La.
Snider v. Pagragan 480 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
The essential question in ruling on the peremptory exception of no cause of action is whether the facts stated in the petition, when conceded as true, legally entitle the plaintiff to the redress sought, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Rosenbloom v. Mecom 478 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Rodrigue v. Copeland 475 So. 2d 1071 La. 1985
we recognized that the prohibitions contained in C.C.
WHC, INC. v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc. 468 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1980); Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Elnaggar v. Fred H. Moran Const. Corp. 468 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In support of their novel proposition, plaintiffs-appellants cite Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
St. Martin v. General Homes-Louisiana, Inc. 467 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Magee v. Employers' Information Service, Inc. 468 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marine Concrete Structures, Inc. 464 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In regard to the exception of no cause of action, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., stated: “The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition.
Broussard v. Guidry 464 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Moore, Romero & Co. v. Nan Corp. 458 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Teachers'retirement System v. La. St. Employees Retirement System 456 So. 2d 594 La. 1984
Hero Land Co. v. Texaco, Inc., at 96 (La.1975); Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of La., Inc. 456 So. 2d 612 La. 1984
The essence of the causes of action, which arise under Civil Code articles 667, 668, 669, and perhaps 2315 as an abuse of right, is that the defendants conducted activities on their premises which unreasonably inconvenienced and personally injured the members of the class for which the defendants are strictly liable.
Bodoin v. Daigle 452 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Tobey v. State 454 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Gibbs Const. v. Board of Sup'rs of LSU 447 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Guy Scroggins, (La.App.
Didier v. Department of State Civil Service 446 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 446 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Quick v. Murphy Oil Co. 446 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
1982); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Faciane v. Southern Shipbuilding Corp. 446 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
3rd Cir.1982); Indeed the policy behind liberal construction of pleadings is to give plaintiffs the opportunity to present evidence in support of their claims.
Conrad v. Conrad 442 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 931; Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Miller v. McDonald's Corp. 439 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Berry v. Bank of Louisiana 439 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, *1169 Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
Gulf South Minerals, Inc. v. Tatco, Inc. 434 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Thomas v. Schanzer 433 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
3rd Cir.1975); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Ward v. Pennington 434 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 434 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
139 , Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Acadian Heritage Realty, (La.App.
Steadman v. Sladovich 430 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n.
Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Bordelon 428 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc., (La.App.
Smith on Behalf of Smith v. City of Kenner 428 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
1976); Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
Scariano Bros. v. Hammond Const. 428 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Hero Land Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Sanders v. Rudd 427 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Androwski v. Ole McDonald's Farms, Inc., (La.App.
Moore v. Moore 427 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
E. Lionel Pavlo Engineering Co. v. State 429 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Marts v. Harbor View Townhouses, Inc. 428 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hubbs v. Canova 427 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
art. 927; Leenerts Farms, Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Brodnax v. Cappel 425 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Wilkins v. Hogan Drilling Co., Inc. 424 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Thus, even assuming that all of the factual allegations of the petition are true, see Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., it states no cause of action because it does not allege a written amendment to extend the agreement to the prospect where G.W.
Buxton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 422 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
1 Cir.1981), writ denied, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. R. Jones Enterprises, Inc. 433 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Overruled Burgess v. City of Shreveport 421 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers 421 So. 2d 216 La. 1982
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Morton v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
McIlwain v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 416 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., American Bank & (La.App.
Williams v. Delta Haven, Inc. 416 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
Gravois v. Helicopter Charter, Ltd. 416 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
We refer to the case of Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., La., in which the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated at page 96: “(1, 2) The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition.
Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc. v. Sumrall 415 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
See Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.